Literature DB >> 15569204

The safety of lymphatic mapping in pregnant breast cancer patients using Tc-99m sulfur colloid.

Angela Keleher1, Richard Wendt, Ebrahim Delpassand, Anne Marie Stachowiak, Henry M Kuerer.   

Abstract

This investigation was undertaken to assess the risk to the embryo/fetus associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy of the breast performed in pregnant patients. Approximately 92.5 MBq (2.5 mCi) of filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid was injected peritumorally the day before surgery in two nonpregnant women with breast cancer. The whole-body distribution of the radiopharmaceutical was evaluated using a gamma camera 1 hour after injection. We then calculated the absorbed dose to the embryo/fetus for three theoretical extreme scenarios of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics: 1) all of the injected radiopharmaceutical remains in the breast and is eliminated only by physical decay; 2) all of the injected radiopharmaceutical is instantaneously transported to the urinary bladder, where it remains and is eliminated only by physical decay; and 3) the injected radiopharmaceutical behaves as though it were administered intravenously, that is, it has the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of Tc-99m sulfur colloid injected for a liver/spleen or bone marrow scan. The fetal radiation absorbed dose was then estimated for two Tc-99m dosages: 18.5 MBq (0.5 mCi) and 92.5 MBq (2.5 mCi). The Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry (MIRD) program was used to estimate the absorbed doses to the embryo/fetus for the first two scenarios. Published data were used to calculate the doses for the third scenario. A single breast is not among the source organs in the MIRD program, so the heart was used as a surrogate in the first scenario. In the two breast cancer patients, whole-body gamma-camera images obtained 1 hour after radiopharmaceutical injection revealed no radioactivity except in the vicinity of the injection site. In the theoretical scenarios, with 92.5 MBq, the highest absorbed doses to the embryo/fetus were as follows: scenario 1, 7.74 x 10(-2) mGy at 9 months of pregnancy; scenario 2, 4.26 mGy during early pregnancy; and scenario 3, 0.342 mGy at 9 months of pregnancy. The maximum absorbed dose to the fetus of 4.3 mGy calculated for the worst-case scenario is well below the 50 mGy that is believed to be the threshold absorbed dose for adverse effects. Thus breast lymphoscintigraphy during pregnancy appears to present a very low risk to the embryo/fetus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15569204     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21503.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Melanoma and pregnancy].

Authors:  C Erfurt-Berge; E Kaempgen
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Sentinel node in breast cancer procedural guidelines.

Authors:  John Buscombe; Giovanni Paganelli; Zeynep E Burak; Wendy Waddington; Jean Maublant; Enrique Prats; Holger Palmedo; Orazio Schillaci; Lorenzo Maffioli; M Lassmann; Carlo Chiesa; Emilio Bombardieri; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma.

Authors:  Annette H Chakera; Birger Hesse; Zeynep Burak; James R Ballinger; Allan Britten; Corrado Caracò; Alistair J Cochran; Martin G Cook; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki; Richard Essner; Einat Even-Sapir; Alexander M M Eggermont; Tanja Gmeiner Stopar; Christian Ingvar; Martin C Mihm; Stanley W McCarthy; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Richard A Scolyer; Hans Starz; John F Thompson; Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Roger Uren; Wendy Waddington; Arturo Chiti; Alain Spatz; Alessandro Testori
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Misconceptions surrounding pregnancy-associated breast cancer.

Authors:  Nada Khalil; Clare Fowler
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-12-17

5.  The EANM clinical and technical guidelines for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; M Fani Bozkurt; David Cibula; Jaume Pahisa; Wim J Oyen; Pilar Paredes; Renato Valdes Olmos; Sergi Vidal Sicart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Oreste Gentilini; Marta Cremonesi; Antonio Toesca; Nicola Colombo; Fedro Peccatori; Roberto Sironi; Claudia Sangalli; Nicole Rotmensz; Guido Pedroli; Giuseppe Viale; Paolo Veronesi; Viviana Galimberti; Aron Goldhirsch; Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Breast cancer diagnosis during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jennifer K Litton; Richard L Theriault; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2009-05

8.  Young Women with Breast Cancer: Fertility Preservation Options and Management of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nikita M Shah; Dana M Scott; Pridvi Kandagatla; Molly B Moravek; Erin F Cobain; Monika L Burness; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Pregnancy associated breast cancer and pregnancy after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Emek Doğer; Eray Calışkan; Peter Mallmann
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-12-01

10.  The EANM and SNMMI practice guideline for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Naomi Alazraki; John N Aarsvold; Riccardo A Audisio; Edwin Glass; Sandra F Grant; Jolanta Kunikowska; Marjut Leidenius; Valeria M Moncayo; Roger F Uren; Wim J G Oyen; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Sergi Vidal Sicart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.