Literature DB >> 15567703

An investigation of the effect of electrode size and electrode location on comfort during stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle.

G M Lyons1, G E Leane, M Clarke-Moloney, J V O'Brien, P A Grace.   

Abstract

The use of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (SNMES) in medicine is well established. However, discomfort has been identified as limiting the use of SNMES in these applications. This pilot study investigated the influence of various electrode sizes and their positioning on perceived pain and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the gastrocnemius muscle using surface electrodes. This study formed part of a research project to develop a therapeutic device for calf muscle blood flow assist applications. Twelve healthy subjects (n=12) participated in this pilot study. Each participant attended the trial centre for testing which consisted of SNMES to four different electrode stimulation sites using two electrode sizes (round with areas 19.63 and 38.48 cm2). Comfort was assessed by asking the subjects to indicate the stimulation amplitude corresponding to the onset of discomfort (pain threshold) and the amplitude at which the discomfort became unbearable (pain tolerance). Of the four stimulation sites tested, two were deemed unsuccessful as it was very difficult to obtain a muscle contraction using these sites, while the remaining two sites elicited good muscle contraction. The most comfortable stimulation was achieved by placing the cathode electrode high on the calf, below the proximal end of the muscle heads and the anode electrode towards the end of the muscle belly and when the 19.63 cm2 electrodes were used at these sites (p=<0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15567703     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  11 in total

1.  Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation: influence of electrode positioning and stimulus amplitude settings on muscle response.

Authors:  M Gobbo; P Gaffurini; L Bissolotti; F Esposito; C Orizio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A new paradigm of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the quadriceps femoris muscle.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Isabelle Vivodtzev; Marco A Minetto; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Association between Disability and Psychological Factors and Dose of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Sara R Piva; Stephanie Lasinski; Gustavo Jm Almeida; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Physiother Pract Res       Date:  2013-01-01

4.  Electrode placement on the forearm for selective stimulation of finger extension/flexion.

Authors:  Xueliang Bao; Yuxuan Zhou; Yunlong Wang; Jianjun Zhang; Xiaoying Lü; Zhigong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Characterizing the transcutaneous electrical recruitment of lower leg afferents in healthy adults: implications for non-invasive treatment of overactive bladder.

Authors:  Eshani Sharan; Kelly Hunter; Magdy Hassouna; Paul B Yoo
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF MEDIUM AND LOW FREQUENCY ON THE QUADRICEPS FEMORIS.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Pinfildi; Rodrigo Antonio Carvalho Andraus; Ligia Megumi Iida; Rodrigo Paschoal Prado
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Effects of electrode size and placement on comfort and efficiency during low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles.

Authors:  J Flodin; R Juthberg; P W Ackermann
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-16

8.  Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation.

Authors:  J Flodin; C Mikkelsen; P W Ackermann
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 9.  Advances in selective activation of muscles for non-invasive motor neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Aikaterini D Koutsou; Juan C Moreno; Antonio J Del Ama; Eduardo Rocon; José L Pons
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 10.  Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.