Literature DB >> 1556745

The urate oxidase gene of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila melanogaster: evolutionary changes of sequence and regulation.

T B Friedman1, J B Burnett, S Lootens, R Steinman, L L Wallrath.   

Abstract

The urate oxidase (UO) transcription unit of Drosophila pseudoobscura was cloned, sequenced, and compared to the UO transcription unit from Drosophila melanogaster. In both species the UO coding region is divided into two exons of approximately equal size. The deduced D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster UO peptides have 346 and 352 amino acid residues, respectively. The nucleotide sequences of the D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster UO protein-coding regions are 82.2% identical whereas the deduced amino acid sequences are 87.6% identical with 42 amino acid changes, 33 of which occur in the first exon. Although the UO gene is expressed exclusively within the cells of the Malpighian tubules in both of these species, the temporal patterns of UO gene activity during development are markedly different. UO enzyme activity, UO protein, and UO mRNA are found in the third instar larva and adult of D. melanogaster but only in the adult stage of D. pseudoobscura. The intronic sequences and the extragenic 5' and 3' flanking regions of the D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster UO genes are highly divergent with the exception of eight small islands of conserved sequence along 772 bp 5' of the UO protein-coding region. These islands of conserved sequence are possible UO cis-acting regulatory elements as they reside along the 5' flanking DNA of the D. melanogaster UO gene that is capable of conferring a wild-type D. melanogaster pattern of UO regulation on a UO-lacZ fusion gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1556745     DOI: 10.1007/bf00163853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  88 in total

1.  Evolutionary conservation of homeodomain-binding sites and other sequences upstream and within the major transcription unit of the Drosophila segmentation gene engrailed.

Authors:  J A Kassis; C Desplan; D K Wright; P H O'Farrell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Functional cooperativity between transcription factors UBF1 and SL1 mediates human ribosomal RNA synthesis.

Authors:  S P Bell; R M Learned; H M Jantzen; R Tjian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Comparison of the consensus sequence flanking translational start sites in Drosophila and vertebrates.

Authors:  D R Cavener
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Evolution of the autosomal chorion locus in Drosophila. I. General organization of the locus and sequence comparisons of genes s15 and s19 in evolutionary distant species.

Authors:  J C Martínez-Cruzado; C Swimmer; M G Fenerjian; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolution and expression of the Sgs-3 glue gene of Drosophila.

Authors:  C H Martin; C A Mayeda; E M Meyerowitz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Ecdysterone receptor is a sequence-specific transcription factor involved in the developmental regulation of heat shock genes.

Authors:  Y Luo; J Amin; R Voellmy
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Peroxisomal protein import is conserved between yeast, plants, insects and mammals.

Authors:  S J Gould; G A Keller; M Schneider; S H Howell; L J Garrard; J M Goodman; B Distel; H Tabak; S Subramani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Sequences sufficient for correct regulation of Sgs-3 lie close to or within the gene.

Authors:  K V Raghavan; M A Crosby; P H Mathers; E M Meyerowitz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change.

Authors:  M Treier; C Pfeifle; D Tautz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  6 in total

1.  Molecular genetic analysis of the nested Drosophila melanogaster lamin C gene.

Authors:  Sandra R Schulze; Beatrice Curio-Penny; Yuhong Li; Reza A Imani; Lena Rydberg; Pamela K Geyer; Lori L Wallrath
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase genes in two Drosophila species: dosage compensation, a nuclear matrix attachment site, and a novel intron position.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1993-04

3.  Nucleotide divergence of the rp49 gene region between Drosophila melanogaster and two species of the Obscura group of Drosophila.

Authors:  C Segarra; M Aguadé
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Sequence and evolution of the Drosophila pseudoobscura glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase locus.

Authors:  R S Wells
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  LMNA variants cause cytoplasmic distribution of nuclear pore proteins in Drosophila and human muscle.

Authors:  George Dialynas; Kaitlin M Flannery; Luka N Zirbel; Peter L Nagy; Katherine D Mathews; Steven A Moore; Lori L Wallrath
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  A comparative study of Drosophila and human A-type lamins.

Authors:  Sandra R Schulze; Beatrice Curio-Penny; Sean Speese; George Dialynas; Diane E Cryderman; Caitrin W McDonough; Demet Nalbant; Melissa Petersen; Vivian Budnik; Pamela K Geyer; Lori L Wallrath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.