Literature DB >> 15566947

Comparison of inverse-dynamics musculo-skeletal models of AL 288-1 Australopithecus afarensis and KNM-WT 15000 Homo ergaster to modern humans, with implications for the evolution of bipedalism.

Weijie Wang1, Robin H Crompton, Tanya S Carey, Michael M Günther, Yu Li, Russell Savage, Williams I Sellers.   

Abstract

Size and proportions of the postcranial skeleton differ markedly between Australopithecus afarensis and Homo ergaster, and between the latter and modern Homo sapiens. This study uses computer simulations of gait in models derived from the best-known skeletons of these species (AL 288-1, Australopithecus afarensis, 3.18 million year ago) and KNM-WT 15000 (Homo ergaster, 1.5-1.8 million year ago) compared to models of adult human males and females, to estimate the required muscle power during bipedal walking, and to compare this with those in modern humans. Skeletal measurements were carried out on a cast of KNM-WT 15000, but for AL 288-1 were taken from the literature. Muscle attachments were applied to the models based on their position relative to the bone in modern humans. Joint motions and moments from experiments on human walking were input into the models to calculate muscle stress and power. The models were tested in erect walking and 'bent-hip bent-knee' gait. Calculated muscle forces were verified against EMG activity phases from experimental data, with reference to reasonable activation/force delays. Calculated muscle powers are reasonably comparable to experimentally derived metabolic values from the literature, given likely values for muscle efficiency. The results show that: 1) if evaluated by the power expenditure per unit of mass (W/kg) in walking, AL 288-1 and KNM-WT 15000 would need similar power to modern humans; however, 2) with distance-specific parameters as the criteria, AL 288-1 would require to expend relatively more muscle power (W/kg.m(-1)) in comparison to modern humans. The results imply that in the evolution of bipedalism, body proportions, for example those of KNM-WT 15000, may have evolved to obtain an effective application of muscle power to bipedal walking over a long distance, or at high speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15566947     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  25 in total

Review 1.  Arboreality, terrestriality and bipedalism.

Authors:  Robin Huw Crompton; William I Sellers; Susannah K S Thorpe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The impact of bone and suture material properties on mandibular function in Alligator mississippiensis: testing theoretical phenotypes with finite element analysis.

Authors:  David A Reed; Laura B Porro; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Justin B Lemberg; Casey M Holliday; Fred Anapol; Callum F Ross
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Architecture and functional ecology of the human gastrocnemius muscle-tendon unit.

Authors:  Erin E Butler; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Stride lengths, speed and energy costs in walking of Australopithecus afarensis: using evolutionary robotics to predict locomotion of early human ancestors.

Authors:  William I Sellers; Gemma M Cain; Weijie Wang; Robin H Crompton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Assessing mechanical function of the zygomatic region in macaques: validation and sensitivity testing of finite element models.

Authors:  K Kupczik; C A Dobson; M J Fagan; R H Crompton; C E Oxnard; P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Musculoskeletal modelling under an evolutionary perspective: deciphering the role of single muscle regions in closely related insects.

Authors:  Sina David; Johannes Funken; Wolfgang Potthast; Alexander Blanke
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  The hominins: a very conservative tribe? Last common ancestors, plasticity and ecomorphology in Hominidae. Or, What's in a name?

Authors:  Robin Huw Crompton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Phylogenetic patterns and correlation of key structures for jumping: bone crests and cross-sectional areas of muscles in Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  María Laura Ponssa; Jéssica Fratani; Virginia Abdala
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 9.  Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor.

Authors:  R H Crompton; E E Vereecke; S K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Morphometrics and inertial properties in the body segments of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Kirsten Schoonaert; Kristiaan D'Août; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.