Literature DB >> 1556657

Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender.

T Holtgraves1, J N Yang.   

Abstract

Several hypotheses derived from P. Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory were tested with Ss from the United States and Korea. Ss imagined themselves in situations in which they were to make a request. They then indicated exactly what they would say in each situation and what their perceptions of the request size, the hearer's power, and the closeness of their relationship with the hearer were. Consistent with P. Brown and Levinson's theory, power, distance, and size contributed significantly to politeness. Significant predictor variable interactions suggested that an additive model is not appropriate. Finally, there was evidence of cultural and gender differences in the weighting of these predictor variables. These differences can partially account for cultural and gender differences in language use.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1556657     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.62.2.246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  4 in total

1.  Utilitarian relevance and face management in the interpretation of ambiguous question/request statements.

Authors:  Virginie Demeure; Jean-François Bonnefon; Eric Raufaste
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

2.  Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks.

Authors:  T Holtgraves
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-01

3.  Parkinson's Disease and Politeness.

Authors:  Thomas Holtgraves; Patrick McNamara
Journal:  J Lang Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-06-01

4.  Politeness and psychological distance: a construal level perspective.

Authors:  Elena Stephan; Nira Liberman; Yaacov Trope
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.