OBJECTIVE: To examine influenza vaccination status and predictors for vaccine receipt among healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with spinal cord injuries and disorders. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, nationwide anonymous survey. SETTING: Twenty-three Veterans Affairs spinal cord injury centers. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand five hundred fifty-six HCWs. METHODS: The primary outcome was staff vaccination status. Independent variables included staff demographic and employment characteristics, health status, attitudes and beliefs about the vaccine, and implications for its use. RESULTS: The staff vaccination rate was 51%. Leading motivators of vaccine receipt were self-protection (77%) and patient protection (49%). The most common reasons for nonreceipt were concerns about side effects (49%), preventive quality (20%), and inconvenience (14%). Logistic regression results suggested that age of 50 years or older (OR, 1.47; P = .021), male gender (OR, 2.50; P < .001), strong belief in vaccine effectiveness (OR, 19.03; P = .008), and importance of HCW vaccination (OR, 20.50; P = .005) significantly increased the probability of vaccination. Recommending the vaccine to coworkers, patients, or patients' families was also associated with HCW vaccination (OR, 3.20; P < .001). Providers who did not believe the vaccine was protective (P < .001) or effective (P < .001) were less likely to recommend it to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to increase vaccination rates among HCWs should address concerns about side effects, effectiveness, and protective value of the vaccine and access to it. The impact of provider recommendations should be stressed. Vaccination and subsequent prevention of illness may limit morbidity and mortality, thus benefiting HCWs, healthcare facilities, and patients.
OBJECTIVE: To examine influenza vaccination status and predictors for vaccine receipt among healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with spinal cord injuries and disorders. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, nationwide anonymous survey. SETTING: Twenty-three Veterans Affairs spinal cord injury centers. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand five hundred fifty-six HCWs. METHODS: The primary outcome was staff vaccination status. Independent variables included staff demographic and employment characteristics, health status, attitudes and beliefs about the vaccine, and implications for its use. RESULTS: The staff vaccination rate was 51%. Leading motivators of vaccine receipt were self-protection (77%) and patient protection (49%). The most common reasons for nonreceipt were concerns about side effects (49%), preventive quality (20%), and inconvenience (14%). Logistic regression results suggested that age of 50 years or older (OR, 1.47; P = .021), male gender (OR, 2.50; P < .001), strong belief in vaccine effectiveness (OR, 19.03; P = .008), and importance of HCW vaccination (OR, 20.50; P = .005) significantly increased the probability of vaccination. Recommending the vaccine to coworkers, patients, or patients' families was also associated with HCW vaccination (OR, 3.20; P < .001). Providers who did not believe the vaccine was protective (P < .001) or effective (P < .001) were less likely to recommend it to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to increase vaccination rates among HCWs should address concerns about side effects, effectiveness, and protective value of the vaccine and access to it. The impact of provider recommendations should be stressed. Vaccination and subsequent prevention of illness may limit morbidity and mortality, thus benefiting HCWs, healthcare facilities, and patients.
Authors: Sara Podczervinski; Zach Stednick; Lois Helbert; Judith Davies; Barbara Jagels; Ted Gooley; Corey Casper; Steven A Pergam Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Rose Wilson; Dimitri Scronias; Anna Zaytseva; Marie-Ange Ferry; Patrick Chamboredon; Eve Dubé; Pierre Verger Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jane A Buxton; Cheryl C McIntyre; Andrew W Tu; Brennan D Eadie; Valencia P Remple; Beth Halperin; Karen L Pielak Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.275