Literature DB >> 15565597

Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal anomalies: an analysis of perinatal management of 318 consecutive pregnancies in a multidisciplinary setting.

Hilmar H Bijma1, Ernst M Schoonderwaldt, Agnes van der Heide, Hajo I J Wildschut, Paul J van der Maas, Juriy W Wladimiroff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to analyse the perinatal management decisions made in a multidisciplinary setting following the prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies and to evaluate to what extent, in clinical practice, decisions about obstetric management are attuned to those about neonatal management.
METHODS: Data on perinatal management of 318 consecutive singleton pregnancies presented to a multidisciplinary perinatal team in a tertiary centre were collected retrospectively.
RESULTS: The multidisciplinary perinatal team decided upon non-aggressive obstetric management in 20% of the cases and consented to termination of pregnancy in 10% of the cases. The multidisciplinary perinatal team decided upon neonatal management in 112(36%) of all fetuses. In 100(89%) of these fetuses, standard neonatal management, and in 12(11%), no neonatal life-sustaining treatment was decided upon. Implementation of the decisions of the multidisciplinary perinatal team on the various management modalities ranged from 88 to 100%.
CONCLUSION: The multidisciplinary perinatal team worked well in making decisions about obstetric management. In 30% of the cases, this concerned end-of-life decisions. However, for the majority of cases, the perinatal team did not plan neonatal management before birth and thereby did not attune obstetric and neonatal management to each other. This probably reflects the different attitudes towards end-of-life decisions between obstetricians and neonatologists. However, to ensure a consistent perinatal management, a multidisciplinary perinatal team has to make prenatal decisions about both obstetric and neonatal management. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15565597     DOI: 10.1002/pd.883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

1.  Paediatrics-based fetal care: unanswered ethical questions.

Authors:  Stephen D Brown; Anne D Lyerly; Margaret O Little; John D Lantos
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  Barriers in referring neonatal patients to perinatal palliative care: a French multicenter survey.

Authors:  Barthélémy Tosello; Lionel Dany; Pierre Bétrémieux; Pierre Le Coz; Pascal Auquier; Catherine Gire; Marie-Ange Einaudi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Perinatal and follow-up outcome study of fetal anomalies with multidisciplinary consultation.

Authors:  Genxia Li; Na Yang; Mingkun Xie; Yajuan Xu; Ning Han; Qi Chen; Hezhou Li; Yueli Wu; Chunhua Cheng; Yuhong Wang; Man Zhou; Bo Xia; Shuhua Guo; Shihong Cui
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  A post-mortem population survey on foetal-infantile end-of-life decisions: a research protocol.

Authors:  Laure Dombrecht; Kim Beernaert; Ellen Roets; Kenneth Chambaere; Filip Cools; Linde Goossens; Gunnar Naulaers; Luc De Catte; Joachim Cohen; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.