G B John Mancini1, David Abbott, Craig Kamimura, Eunice Yeoh. 1. Cardiovascular Imaging Research Core Laboratory, Vancouver Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. mancini@interchange.ubc.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is an accepted method for the detection of subclinical atherosclerosis. Valid methods that allow quantitation of carotid atheroma burden may be useful for stratifying risk. OBJECTIVE: To validate the results of intima medial thickness (IMT) and plaque measurements using a newly created software algorithm by comparing them with those obtained using a previously validated method. METHODS: Carotid ultrasound videotapes (n=24) were analyzed by experienced observers using a validated method and a new method. Ultrasound parameters were compared by measuring the difference +/- SD to yield indexes of accuracy and precision. Performance was also assessed using correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Average IMT (n=24), plaque area (n=46), and several indexes that integrate IMT and plaque measurements were all found to be comparable with measurements obtained using the previously validated method. For example, the plaque area showed excellent accuracy and precision (-0.17+/-2.0 mm2, P=0.56), excellent correlation (r=0.98, standard error of the estimate = 2.01 mm2, P<0.001) and no evidence of bias using Bland-Altman analyses (Spearman's rho = 0.04, P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: A new algorithm for the quantitation of carotid atheroma burden yields results that are comparable with those of a previously validated and widely used method. Availability of valid tools for measuring carotid ultrasound should facilitate the incorporation of this procedure into clinical risk stratification paradigms.
BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is an accepted method for the detection of subclinical atherosclerosis. Valid methods that allow quantitation of carotid atheroma burden may be useful for stratifying risk. OBJECTIVE: To validate the results of intima medial thickness (IMT) and plaque measurements using a newly created software algorithm by comparing them with those obtained using a previously validated method. METHODS: Carotid ultrasound videotapes (n=24) were analyzed by experienced observers using a validated method and a new method. Ultrasound parameters were compared by measuring the difference +/- SD to yield indexes of accuracy and precision. Performance was also assessed using correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Average IMT (n=24), plaque area (n=46), and several indexes that integrate IMT and plaque measurements were all found to be comparable with measurements obtained using the previously validated method. For example, the plaque area showed excellent accuracy and precision (-0.17+/-2.0 mm2, P=0.56), excellent correlation (r=0.98, standard error of the estimate = 2.01 mm2, P<0.001) and no evidence of bias using Bland-Altman analyses (Spearman's rho = 0.04, P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: A new algorithm for the quantitation of carotid atheroma burden yields results that are comparable with those of a previously validated and widely used method. Availability of valid tools for measuring carotid ultrasound should facilitate the incorporation of this procedure into clinical risk stratification paradigms.
Authors: Patricia H Davis; Jeffrey D Dawson; M Beth Blecha; Rebecca K Mastbergen; Milan Sonka Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Nurit Fox; Najib Ayas; Julie E Park; John Fleetham; C Frank Ryan; Scott A Lear; Alan Mulgrew; Sammy Chan; John Hill; G B John Mancini; Graham C Wong Journal: Lung Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Jeffrey D Dawson; Milan Sonka; Mary Beth Blecha; Wenjiao Lin; Patricia H Davis Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Catalin Taraboanta; Cameron J Hague; G B John Mancini; Bruce B Forster; Jiri Frohlich Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Ricardo S Oliveira; Alan R Barker; Florian Debras; Sascha H Kranen; Craig A Williams Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Richard S Liu; Sophie Dunn; Anneke C Grobler; Katherine Lange; Denise Becker; Greta Goldsmith; John B Carlin; Markus Juonala; Melissa Wake; David P Burgner Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 2.692