Literature DB >> 15563880

Discrepancy between sperm acrosin activity and sperm morphology: significance for fertilization in vitro.

Michel R Langlois1, Luc Oorlynck, Frank Vandekerckhove, Arnold Criel, Dirk Bernard, Victor Blaton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In routine semen analysis, discrepancies may occur between sperm acrosin activity test results and sperm acrosomal morphology.
METHODS: Discrepant test results of sperm acrosin activity (spectrophotometric assay) vs. sperm morphology (strict criteria) in the initial diagnostic investigation of 107 infertile couples were evaluated with respect to fertilization rate (% oocytes with 2 pronuclei) further obtained in IVF treatment.
RESULTS: Acrosin activity positively correlated with sperm morphology (% normal forms) (r=0.537) and fertilization rate (r=0.526). ROC curves for the prediction of > or =50% fertilization rate were comparable for acrosin activity and sperm morphology, with optimal cutoff values at 25 microIU/10(6) sperm and 10%, respectively. In multiple regression analysis, sperm acrosin activity (P=0.002) predicted fertilization rate independently of sperm morphology (P<0.001) and sperm vitality (eosin-nigrosin stain) (P=0.03). Acrosin activities > or =25 microIU/10(6) sperm were observed in 36% of severe teratozoospermic samples (< or =4% normal spermatozoa) associated with low fertilization rate. Twenty percent of the morphologically normal ejaculates showed a low acrosin activity (<25 microIU/10(6) sperm) and low hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) scores (31.4+/-7.6%) and were associated with low fertilization rate.
CONCLUSION: The sperm acrosin assay can help to predict sperm fertilizing capacity in IVF independently of sperm morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15563880     DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  7 in total

1.  Incorporation of the acrosome into the oocyte during intracytoplasmic sperm injection could be potentially hazardous to embryo development.

Authors:  Kazuto Morozumi; Ryuzo Yanagimachi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Semen analysis in 21st century medicine: the need for sperm function testing.

Authors:  Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Fluorescent multiple staining and CASA system to assess boar sperm viability and membranes integrity in short and long-term extenders.

Authors:  A Lange-Consiglio; A Meucci; F Cremonesi
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2013-03-05

4.  Elucidating the Role of K+ Channels during In Vitro Capacitation of Boar Spermatozoa: Do SLO1 Channels Play a Crucial Role?

Authors:  Marc Yeste; Marc Llavanera; Guillermo Pérez; Fabiana Scornik; Josep Puig-Parri; Ramon Brugada; Sergi Bonet; Elisabeth Pinart
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Transport of Acrosomal Enzymes by KIFC1 via the Acroframosomal Cytoskeleton during Spermatogenesis in Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea, Decapoda, Malacostracea).

Authors:  Le Chang; Qiu-Meng Xiang; Jun-Quan Zhu; Yin-Er Chen; Dao-Jun Tang; Chun-Dan Zhang; Cong-Cong Hou
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Human sperm acrosome function assays are predictive of fertilization rate in vitro: a retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fang Xu; Ganggang Guo; Wenbing Zhu; Liqing Fan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 7.  The Impact of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Male Fertility: Focus on the Action of Obesogens.

Authors:  Luís Rato; Ana C A Sousa
Journal:  J Xenobiot       Date:  2021-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.