Literature DB >> 15563517

Pharmacodynamic studies of amoxicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison of a new pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation (2000 mg twice daily) with standard dosage regimens.

Inga Odenholt1, Otto Cars, Elisabeth Löwdin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pharmacodynamic effects of a pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation of amoxicillin 2000 mg twice daily, with amoxicillin 875 mg twice daily, 875 mg three times daily and 500 mg three times daily against Streptococcus pneumoniae with different susceptibility to amoxicillin in an in vitro kinetic model.
METHODS: Strains of S. pneumoniae with amoxicillin MICs of 1, 2, 4 and 8 mg/L at an initial inoculum of approximately 10(5) cfu/mL were exposed to amoxicillin in an in vitro kinetic model simulating the human serum concentration-time profile of the pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation twice daily (C(max) 17 mg/L after 1.5 h). All isolates were also exposed to amoxicillin with concentration-time profiles correlating to the human dosage of 875 mg twice daily (C(max) 15 mg/L after 1 h), 875 mg three times daily and 500 mg (C(max) 8 mg/L after 1 h) three times daily with simulated half-life of 1 h. Repeated samples were taken regularly during 24 h and viable counts were carried out.
RESULTS: Overall, the pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation was more effective at reducing bacterial counts than any of the other formulations evaluated. Eradication was achieved with the enhanced formulation for strains with a MIC of < or =2 mg/L, however, regrowth occurred with the other dosing regimens. In the experiments with the strain with a MIC of 4 mg/L, the enhanced formulation kept the bacterial counts < or =10(2) cfu/mL for at least 14 out of 24 h tested. In contrast, none of the other formulations reduced the bacterial counts down to < or =10(2) cfu/mL at any point. None of the regimens was able to eradicate the strain with an MIC of 8 mg/L, even though an initial substantial kill was noted with the enhanced formulation after both doses. The least effective dosage regimen for all strains was 875 mg twice daily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15563517     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  4 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic effects of telavancin against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains in the presence of human albumin or serum and in an in vitro kinetic model.

Authors:  Inga Odenholt; Elisabeth Löwdin; Otto Cars
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Antibiotic dose impact on resistance selection in the community: a mathematical model of beta-lactams and Streptococcus pneumoniae dynamics.

Authors:  Lulla Opatowski; Jonas Mandel; Emmanuelle Varon; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Laura Temime; Didier Guillemot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Probable mechanisms of biocidal action of Cocos nucifera Husk extract and fractions on bacteria isolates.

Authors:  David A Akinpelu; Kazeem A Alayande; Olayinka A Aiyegoro; Oluseun F Akinpelu; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 4.  The Role of PK/PD Analysis in the Development and Evaluation of Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Alicia Rodríguez-Gascón; María Ángeles Solinís; Arantxa Isla
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.