Literature DB >> 15563359

Subjective and physiological responses among racemic-methadone maintenance patients in relation to relative (S)- vs. (R)-methadone exposure.

Timothy B Mitchell1, Kyle R Dyer, David Newcombe, Amy Salter, Andrew A Somogyi, Felix Bochner, Jason M White.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the possibility that (S)-methadone influences therapeutic and adverse responses to rac-methadone maintenance treatment, by examining how subjective and physiological responses among rac-methadone maintenance patients vary in relation to relative exposure to (S)- vs. (R)-methadone.
METHODS: Mood states (Profile of Mood States), opioid withdrawal (Methadone Symptoms Checklist), physiological responses (pupil diameter, heart rate, respiration rate, blood pressure), and plasma concentrations (CP) of (R)- and (S)-methadone were measured concurrently 11-12 times over a 24-h interdosing interval in 55 methadone maintenance patients. Average steady-state plasma concentrations (C(av)) and pharmacodynamic responses were calculated using area under the curve (AUC). Linear regression was used to determine whether variability in pharmacodynamic responses was accounted for by (S)-methadone C(av) controlling for (R)-methadone C(av) and rac-methadone dose. Ratios of (S)-:(R)-methadone using AUC(CP) and trough values were correlated with pharmacodynamic responses for all subjects and separately for those with daily rac-methadone doses > or = 100 mg.
RESULTS: (S)-methadone C(av) accounted for significant variability in pharmacodynamic responses beyond that accounted for by (R)-methadone C(av) and rac-methadone dose, showing positive associations (partial r) with the intensity of negative mood states such as Tension (0.28), Fatigue (0.31), Confusion (0.32), and opioid withdrawal scores (0.30); an opposite pattern of relationships was evident for (R)-methadone. The plasma (S)-:(R)-methadone AUC(CP) ratio (mean +/- SD 1.05 +/- 0.21, range 0.65-1.51) was not significantly related to pharmacodynamic responses for the subjects as a whole but showed significant positive associations (r) with the intensity of negative mood states such as Total Mood Disturbance (0.61), Tension (0.69), Fatigue (0.65), Confusion (0.64), Depression (0.49) and heart rate (0.59) for the > or = 100-mg dose range.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings agree with previous evidence that (S)-methadone is associated with a significant and potentially adverse profile of responses distinct from that of (R)-methadone. Individual variability in relative (S)- vs. (R)-methadone exposure may be associated with variability in response to rac-methadone maintenance treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15563359      PMCID: PMC1884641          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02221.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  40 in total

1.  Stereoselective disposition of methadone in man.

Authors:  M J Kreek; D L Hachey; P D Klein
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1979-03-05       Impact factor: 5.037

2.  The d- and l-isomers of methadone bind to the non-competitive site on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in rat forebrain and spinal cord.

Authors:  A L Gorman; K J Elliott; C E Inturrisi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Patterns of symptom complaints in methadone maintenance patients.

Authors:  K R Dyer; J M White
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  d-Methadone is antinociceptive in the rat formalin test.

Authors:  N Shimoyama; M Shimoyama; K J Elliott; C E Inturrisi
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  NMDA receptor function and human cognition: the effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A K Malhotra; D A Pinals; H Weingartner; K Sirocco; C D Missar; D Pickar; A Breier
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Opioid analgesics as noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists.

Authors:  B Ebert; C Thorkildsen; S Andersen; L L Christrup; H Hjeds
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Subanesthetic effects of the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in humans. Psychotomimetic, perceptual, cognitive, and neuroendocrine responses.

Authors:  J H Krystal; L P Karper; J P Seibyl; G K Freeman; R Delaney; J D Bremner; G R Heninger; M B Bowers; D S Charney
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

8.  The mu1, mu2, delta, kappa opioid receptor binding profiles of methadone stereoisomers and morphine.

Authors:  K Kristensen; C B Christensen; L L Christrup
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 9.  The NMDA antagonist model for schizophrenia: promise and pitfalls.

Authors:  W M Abi-Saab; D C D'Souza; B Moghaddam; J H Krystal
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.788

10.  Serotonin and norepinephrine uptake inhibiting activity of centrally acting analgesics: structural determinants and role in antinociception.

Authors:  E E Codd; R P Shank; J J Schupsky; R B Raffa
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  13 in total

1.  The worldwide opioid epidemic: implications for treatment and research in pregnancy and the newborn.

Authors:  David Knoppert
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Tell-Tale SNPs: The Role of CYP2B6 in Methadone Fatalities.

Authors:  Taha Ahmad; Samie Sabet; Donald A Primerano; Lauren L Richards-Waugh; Gary O Rankin
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Within- and between- subject variability in methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in methadone maintenance subjects.

Authors:  Julia Hanna; David J R Foster; Amy Salter; Andrew A Somogyi; Jason M White; Felix Bochner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Pharmacological maintenance treatments of opiate addiction.

Authors:  James Bell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Effects of cytochrome P450 single nucleotide polymorphisms on methadone metabolism and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Taha Ahmad; Monica A Valentovic; Gary O Rankin
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 6.  Interindividual variability of methadone response: impact of genetic polymorphism.

Authors:  Yongfang Li; Jean-Pierre Kantelip; Pauline Gerritsen-van Schieveen; Siamak Davani
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Cannabis and benzodiazepines as determinants of methadone trough plasma concentration variability in maintenance treatment: a transnational study.

Authors:  Richard Hallinan; Séverine Crettol; Kingsley Agho; John Attia; Jacques Besson; Marina Croquette-Krokar; Robert Hämmig; Jean-Jacques Déglon; Andrew Byrne; John Ray; Andrew A Somogyi; Chin B Eap
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Fatal methadone toxicity: potential role of CYP3A4 genetic polymorphism.

Authors:  Lauren L Richards-Waugh; Donald A Primerano; Yulia Dementieva; James C Kraner; Gary O Rankin
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Contribution of cytochrome P450 and ABCB1 genetic variability on methadone pharmacokinetics, dose requirements, and response.

Authors:  Francina Fonseca; Rafael de la Torre; Laura Díaz; Antonio Pastor; Elisabet Cuyàs; Nieves Pizarro; Olha Khymenets; Magí Farré; Marta Torrens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Case report: quantification of methadone-induced respiratory depression using toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Bruno Mégarbane; Xavier Declèves; Vanessa Bloch; Christophe Bardin; François Chast; Frédéric J Baud
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.