Literature DB >> 15563288

Worker exposure standard for phosphine gas.

Bill Pepelko1, Joel Seckar, Paul R Harp, James H Kim, David Gray, Elizabeth L Anderson.   

Abstract

The 1998 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) re-registration eligibility decision (RED) for phosphine fumigants has generated much interest in defining safe levels of exposure for workers and worker bystanders. This report summarizes the pertinent literature on phosphine toxicity, including animal inhalation studies and human epidemiology studies, and also describes a margin-of-exposure (MOE) analysis based on available worker exposure data. In addition, a safe occupational exposure limit is estimated using typical OPP assumptions, after determination of appropriate uncertainty factors, based on quality of data in the principal study and pharmacokinetic considerations. While a conservative 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) of 0.1 ppm was calculated, the overall weight of evidence, from a risk-management perspective, supports a conclusion that an occupational TWA of 0.3 ppm provides adequate health protection. In addition, a 15-minute short-term exposure limit (STEL) of 3 ppm was estimated. Finally, in contrast to the MOE analysis described in the OPP's phosphine RED, the MOE analysis described herein does not indicate that fumigation workers are currently being exposed to unacceptable levels of phosphine. Collectively, these findings support the occupational exposure limits of 0.3 ppm (8-hour TWA) and 1 ppm (STEL) established in the updated applicator's manuals for phosphine-generating products, which recently received approval from OPP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15563288     DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00519.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  5 in total

1.  Biochemical Toxic Response of Phosphine on Human Health Estimated From Enzymatic Variance in Trogoderma granarium.

Authors:  Asma Naeem; Asma Waheed Qureshi; Shafia Arshad; Anila Shehzadi; Asim Kamran; Shehla Noreen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.623

2.  Oregon indigenous farmworkers: results of promotor intervention on pesticide knowledge and organophosphate metabolite levels.

Authors:  Linda McCauley; Jennifer D Runkle; Julie Samples; Bryan Williams; Juan F Muniz; Marie Semple; Nargess Shadbeh
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  The tobacco industry and pesticide regulations: case studies from tobacco industry archives.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Gina Solomon; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Phosphine toxicity: ethical questions.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Anderson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Inhalational Toxicity of Aluminum Phosphide as an Ongoing Concern; a Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Azam Shafahi; Babak Mostafazadeh; Bita Dadpour
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-11-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.