Literature DB >> 15562201

Continuous glucose monitoring and the reality of metabolic control in preschool children with type 1 diabetes.

George S Jeha1, Lefkothea P Karaviti, Barbara Anderson, E O'Brian Smith, Susan Donaldson, Toniean S McGirk, Morey W Haymond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine using the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) 1) whether twice-daily insulin injection therapy achieves adequate control in preschool children with type 1 diabetes and 2) whether the CGMS is more informative than self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) regarding glucose control and well tolerated by preschool children and their families. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten children <6 years of age with type 1 diabetes were monitored twice using the CGMS. The distribution of glucose values was analyzed, particularly the frequency, duration, and distribution of hypoglycemia. We analyzed the accuracy of the CGMS in detecting hypoglycemia as well as the clinical relevance of the difference between CGMS and SMBG values.
RESULTS: Although hypoglycemia was more frequent during the night (0.8 nighttime episodes . subject(-1) . 24 h(-1) vs. 0.3 daytime episodes . subject(-1) . 24 h(-1)), the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07). However, nighttime episodes lasted longer than daytime episodes (1.2 vs. 0.2 h . subject(-1) . 24 h(-1), P=0.006). Hypoglycemia accounted for 7% and normoglycemia for 24%, while hyperglycemia occurred 64% of the time, with postprandial hyperglycemia being an almost universal feature (94 +/- 7% of all postmeal values). The CGMS correlated well with SMBG without significant clinical discrepancy. The CGMS sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia was 70% with a specificity of 99%; however, the CGMS detected twice as many total episodes as SMBG (82 vs. 40).
CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily insulin injection rarely achieves control in preschool children with type 1 diabetes. The CGMS is well tolerated by patients and has the advantage of revealing daily glucose trends missed by SMBG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15562201     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.12.2881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  5 in total

1.  Prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia using predictive alarm algorithms and insulin pump suspension.

Authors:  Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Eyal Dassau; Erin Cobry; Paula Clinton; Victoria Gage; Kimberly Caswell; John Wilkinson; Fraser Cameron; Hyunjin Lee; B Wayne Bequette; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Feeding problems reported by parents of young children with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy and their associations with children's glycemic control.

Authors:  Susana R Patton; Laura B Williams; Lawrence M Dolan; Ming Chen; Scott W Powers
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Average Daily Risk Range (ADRR) in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Maureen Monaghan; Tamiko B Younge; Robert McCarter; Fran R Cogen; Randi Streisand
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 4.  Continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Robert Henry Slover
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 5.  Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Miranda Langendam; Yoeri M Luijf; Lotty Hooft; J Hans Devries; Aart H Mudde; Rob J P M Scholten
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.