Literature DB >> 15562181

A simple multistage field test for the prediction of anaerobic capacity in female games players.

S-M Cooper1, J S Baker, Z E Eaton, N Matthews.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the validity of a 15 m multistage shuttle run test (MSRT) as a predictor of anaerobic capacity (expressed as mean power output (MPO) from the 30 second Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT)) in female university standard games players.
METHODS: Data came from three phases using a total of 72 players (mean (SD) age 20.3 (1.5) years, body mass 64.9 (8.8) kg, and stature 1.67 (0.04) m). The repeatability of the MSRT was assessed in phase 1 by applying 95% limits of agreement (LoA) to the test and retest results from a random sample of 20 players. In phase 2, linear relations between MPO and performance on the MSRT were investigated in a random sample of 36 players. As a result, a calibration model (Y = a + bX) was developed and cross validated in phase 3, in which the remaining 36 players performed both the WAnT and the MSRT. Time (seconds) to volitional exhaustion/disqualification from the MSRT was substituted into the calibration model from which MPO was predicted. The agreement between MPO predicted and MPO measured from the WAnT was quantified using LoA.
RESULTS: Insignificant bias between repeat applications of the MSRT (mean(diff) (SD(diff)) = 1.0 (3.5) seconds (4 (14) m), t = 1.23, p = 0.230) was found from phase 1. Data were homoscedastic (r = 0.061, p = 0.799) with LoA +/- 6.9 seconds (+/- 27 m). In phase 2 the strongest correlation was between MPO (W/kg(0.67)) and time to volitional exhaustion/disqualification on the MSRT; r = 0.715 (r(2) = 51.1%, p = 0.0005). As a result, the calibration model developed was: MPO (W/kg(0.67)) = 12.5 + (0.2 x time (seconds)) with a standard error of prediction of 2.1 W/kg(0.67). The cross validation in phase 3 showed insignificant bias between measured and predicted MPO (mean(diff) (SD(diff)) = 0.3 (2.8) W/kg(0.67), t = 0.75, p = 0.460). Data were homoscedastic (r = 0.05, p = 0.774) with LoA +/- 5.5 W/kg(0.67).
CONCLUSIONS: The MSRT requires minimal equipment and training of assessors, and it is easy to perform. In the population studied, it provides scores that are repeatable, and anaerobic capacity (MPO) can be successfully predicted from its performance. It would seem therefore to be a useful field based test for use by female games players, their coaches, and support scientists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15562181      PMCID: PMC1724973          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.012229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  20 in total

1.  Is the O2 deficit an accurate quantitative measure of the anaerobic energy production during intense exercise?

Authors:  J Bangsbo
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1992-09

2.  The maximally accumulated oxygen deficit as an indicator of anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  C B Scott; F B Roby; T G Lohman; J C Bunt
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  The effects of sample size and variability on the correlation coefficient.

Authors:  B T Bates; S Zhang; J S Dufek; F C Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Validity and measurement agreement in sports performance.

Authors:  A Nevill
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Relative importance of aerobic and anaerobic energy release during short-lasting exhausting bicycle exercise.

Authors:  J I Medbø; I Tabata
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-11

6.  Maximal shuttle running over 40 m as a measure of anaerobic performance.

Authors:  J Baker; R Ramsbottom; R Hazeldine
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Anaerobic capacity: a maximal anaerobic running test versus the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit.

Authors:  N S Maxwell; M A Nimmo
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  1996-02

Review 8.  Measurement of anaerobic capacities in humans. Definitions, limitations and unsolved problems.

Authors:  S Green; B Dawson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Applied physiology of female soccer players.

Authors:  J A Davis; J Brewer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake.

Authors:  R Ramsbottom; J Brewer; C Williams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of a 20-s alternative to the wingate anaerobic test in team sport male athletes.

Authors:  Ahmed Attia; Younes Hachana; Helmi Chaabène; Abdelmajid Gaddour; Zied Neji; Roy J Shephard; Mohamed Souhaiel Chelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  A review of the physiological and psychological health and wellbeing of naval service personnel and the modalities used for monitoring.

Authors:  Cliodhna Sargent; Cormac Gebruers; Jim O'Mahony
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2017-01-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.