| Literature DB >> 15562063 |
Paul Dalley1, Brian Robinson, Jennifer Weller, Catherine Caldwell.
Abstract
New anesthesia delivery systems are becoming increasingly complex. Although equipment is involved in a large proportion of intraoperative anesthesia problems (most also involving human error), the current methods of introducing new equipment into clinical practice have not been well studied. We designed a randomized, controlled, prospective study to investigate an alternative method of introducing new anesthesia equipment. Fifteen anesthesiology trainees were randomized to either the standard introduction to a Drager Fabius GS anesthesia delivery machine plus simulated clinical use of the new machine in a high-fidelity human patient simulator (HPS) (Group 1) or to the standard introduction alone (Group 2). We used a questionnaire to seek their opinion on the new equipment, and responses showed that both groups were comparable in their reported confidence to use the new equipment safely. All trainees were then tested in two simulated anesthetic crises with the new machine. Performance was analyzed in terms of time to resolve the emergency, by using analysis of videos by an independent rater. Group 1 resolved both crises significantly faster. HPS allowed us to detect design features that were common sources of error.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15562063 DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136804.46675.EA
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anesth Analg ISSN: 0003-2999 Impact factor: 5.108