Literature DB >> 15562015

Lack of effect of calcium intake on the 25-hydroxyvitamin d response to oral vitamin D3.

Rula Goussous1, Lingyi Song, Gerard E Dallal, Bess Dawson-Hughes.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of calcium intake on the rise in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels in response to supplemental vitamin D(3). Fifty-two healthy older men and women were randomly assigned to take calcium (500 mg twice daily with meals) or placebo tablets for 90 d between October 1 and the end of March. All participants were placed on 800 IU/d (20 microg/d) vitamin D(3). Serum 25(OH)D measurements were made at baseline and on d 30, 60, and 90. The mean baseline 25(OH)D values were 19.2 +/- 6.4 ng/ml (47.9 +/- 15.9 nmol/liter) in the calcium group and 19.6 +/- 6.7 ng/ml (49.1 +/- 16.7 nmol/liter) in the control group (P = 0.808). The difference in pattern of change in 25(OH)D was not statistically significant (group by time interaction, P = 0.651); the calcium group increased 6.5 +/- 5.9 ng/ml (16.2 +/- 14.8 nmol/liter; P < 0.001), and the control group increased 6.6 +/- 7.0 ng/ml (16.6 +/- 17.4 nmol/liter; P < 0.001). The 95% confidence interval for difference in mean increase, calcium vs. control, was -3.8 +/- 3.5 ng/ml (-9.6, 8.7) nmol/liter. In older men and women, the level of calcium intake, within the range of 500-1500 mg/d, does not have an important effect on the rise in serum 25(OH)D that occurs in response to 800 IU (20 microg)/d vitamin D(3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15562015     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-1380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  9 in total

1.  Estimates of optimal vitamin D status.

Authors:  Bess Dawson-Hughes; Robert P Heaney; Michael F Holick; Paul Lips; Pierre J Meunier; Reinhold Vieth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Vitamin D Metabolism and Guidelines for Vitamin D Supplementation.

Authors:  Indra Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

3.  IOF position statement: vitamin D recommendations for older adults.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; A Mithal; J-P Bonjour; S Boonen; P Burckhardt; G E-H Fuleihan; R G Josse; P Lips; J Morales-Torres; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Optimal vitamin D status and serum parathyroid hormone concentrations in African American women.

Authors:  John F Aloia; Sonia A Talwar; Simcha Pollack; Martin Feuerman; James K Yeh
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Vitamin D status and impact of vitamin D3 and/or calcium supplementation in a randomized pilot study in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Marjorie L McCullough; Roberd M Bostick; Carrie R Daniel; W Dana Flanders; Aasma Shaukat; Jill Davison; Udaya Rangaswamy; Bruce W Hollis
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Vitamin D status of black and white Americans and changes in vitamin D metabolites after varied doses of vitamin D supplementation.

Authors:  Naweed S Alzaman; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Jason Nelson; David D'Alessio; Anastassios G Pittas
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Body size and serum 25 hydroxy vitamin D response to oral supplements in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Miriam Blum; Gerard E Dallal; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Factors Affecting 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration in Response to Vitamin D Supplementation.

Authors:  Hajar Mazahery; Pamela R von Hurst
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Vitamin D dose response is underestimated by Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Malachi J McKenna; Barbara F Murray
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.335

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.