Literature DB >> 15561851

Evolution of ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in in vitro pharmacokinetic environments.

Jeffrey J Campion1, Patrick J McNamara, Martin E Evans.   

Abstract

The development of novel antibacterial agents is decreasing despite increasing resistance to presently available agents among common pathogens. Insights into relationships between pharmacodynamics and resistance may provide ways to optimize the use of existing agents. The evolution of resistance was examined in two ciprofloxacin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains exposed to in vitro-simulated clinical and experimental ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetic profiles for 96 h. As the average steady-state concentration (C(avg ss)) increased, the rate of killing approached a maximum, and the rate of regrowth decreased. The enrichment of subpopulations with mutations in grlA and low-level ciprofloxacin resistance also varied depending on the pharmacokinetic environment. A regimen producing values for C(avg ss) slightly above the MIC selected resistant variants with grlA mutations that did not evolve to higher levels of resistance. Clinical regimens which provided values for C(avg ss) intermediate to the MIC and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) resulted in the emergence of subpopulations with gyrA mutations and higher levels of resistance. A regimen producing values for C(avg ss) close to the MPC selected grlA mutants, but the appearance of subpopulations with higher levels of resistance was diminished. A regimen designed to maintain ciprofloxacin concentrations entirely above the MPC appeared to eradicate low-level resistant variants in the inoculum and prevent the emergence of higher levels of resistance. There was no relationship between the time that ciprofloxacin concentrations remained between the MIC and the MPC and the degree of resistance or the presence or type of ciprofloxacin-resistance mutations that appeared in grlA or gyrA. Regimens designed to eradicate low-level resistant variants in S. aureus populations may prevent the emergence of higher levels of fluoroquinolone resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15561851      PMCID: PMC529206          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4733-4744.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  57 in total

1.  Novel ciprofloxacin-resistant, nalidixic acid-susceptible mutant of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Laura J V Piddock; Yu Fang Jin; Mark A Webber; Martin J Everett
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Trends in antimicrobial drug development: implications for the future.

Authors:  Brad Spellberg; John H Powers; Eric P Brass; Loren G Miller; John E Edwards
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood.

Authors:  A A Miles; S S Misra; J O Irwin
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1938-11

4.  Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999.

Authors:  D J Diekema; M A Pfaller; F J Schmitz; J Smayevsky; J Bell; R N Jones; M Beach
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (I): Relationships between AUC above MIC and area under the inhibitory curve for cefmenoxime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  J J Schentag; D E Nix; M H Adelman
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-10

Review 6.  The antibiotic selective process: concentration-specific amplification of low-level resistant populations.

Authors:  F Baquero; M C Negri; M I Morosini; J Blázquez
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1997

7.  The population genetics of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  B R Levin; M Lipsitch; V Perrot; S Schrag; R Antia; L Simonsen; N M Walker; F M Stewart
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  The comparative pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of single-dose ciprofloxacin 400 mg i.v. and 750 mg po.

Authors:  C Catchpole; J M Andrews; J Woodcock; R Wise
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Characterization of gyrA, gyrB, grlA and grlB mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H Takahashi; T Kikuchi; S Shoji; S Fujimura; A B Lutfor; Y Tokue; T Nukiwa; A Watanabe
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  20 in total

1.  Mechanism-based pharmacodynamic models of fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Philip Chung; Patrick J McNamara; Jeffrey J Campion; Martin E Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of ciprofloxacin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Campion; Patrick J McNamara; Martin E Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Low correlation between MIC and mutant prevention concentration.

Authors:  Karl Drlica; Xilin Zhao; Joseph M Blondeau; Christine Hesje
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antibiotic pharmacodynamics and bacterial resistance: usefulness of in vitro models.

Authors:  Stephen H Zinner; Alexander Firsov
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of the influence of inoculum size on the selection of resistance in Escherichia coli by a quinolone in a mouse thigh bacterial infection model.

Authors:  Aude A Ferran; Anne-Sylvie Kesteman; Pierre-Louis Toutain; Alain Bousquet-Mélou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Hyperosmotic Agents and Antibiotics Affect Dissolved Oxygen and pH Concentration Gradients in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Authors:  Mia Mae Kiamco; Erhan Atci; Abdelrhman Mohamed; Douglas R Call; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Role of phage-antibiotic combination in reducing antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ara Jo; Jeongjin Kim; Tian Ding; Juhee Ahn
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.391

8.  In Vitro Resistance Selection in Shigella flexneri by Azithromycin, Ceftriaxone, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin.

Authors:  George P Allen; Kayla A Harris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Enrichment of fluoroquinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: oscillating ciprofloxacin concentrations simulated at the upper and lower portions of the mutant selection window.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Irene Y Lubenko; Maria V Smirnova; Elena N Strukova; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Antibacterial Activity of Hexadecynoic Acid Isomers toward Clinical Isolates of Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  David J Sanabria-Ríos; Christian Morales-Guzmán; Joseph Mooney; Solymar Medina; Tomás Pereles-De-León; Ashley Rivera-Román; Carlimar Ocasio-Malavé; Damarith Díaz; Nataliya Chorna; Néstor M Carballeira
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 1.880

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.