Literature DB >> 15561813

A randomized comparison of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa and weekly epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with breast, lung, or gynecologic cancer.

Lee S Schwartzberg1, Lorrin K Yee, Frank M Senecal, Veena Charu, Dianne Tomita, Joel Wallace, Greg Rossi.   

Abstract

An important clinical question is the relative efficacy of the most common dosages of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp; Amgen Inc.; Thousand Oaks, CA) 200 microg every 2 weeks (Q2W) and epoetin alfa (Procrit; Ortho Biotech Products, LP; Raritan, NJ) 40,000 U weekly (QW) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. We designed three concurrent randomized, open-label, multicenter, identical trials (with the exception of tumor type criteria of breast, gynecologic, or lung cancer) of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia to validate the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Anemia (PSQ-An) treatment tool and to compare the efficacies and safety profiles of these two agents. In each trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either darbepoetin alfa at a dose of 200 microg Q2W or epoetin alfa at a dose of 40,000 U QW for up to 16 weeks. The PSQ-An was assessed for validity, feasibility, and reliability. Secondary clinical endpoints were analyzed using the primary analysis set. Both individual trial analyses and a protocol-specified combined analysis of data from all three trials were conducted. Overall, 312 patients (157 darbepoetin alfa; 155 epoetin alfa) were randomized and received study drug. Baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups in each trial and overall. The PSQ-An was valid, feasible, and reliable. In general, no difference between treatment groups was observed for hemoglobin- and transfusion-based endpoints in each individual trial or in the combined analysis. From exploratory analyses, achievement and maintenance of a hemoglobin target range (11-13 g/dl) were similar in both groups. No differences in safety were observed. With the PSQ-An, formal comparisons of the impact of anemia therapies on patients and caregivers can be made in future prospective studies. Further, darbepoetin alfa (200 microg Q2W) and epoetin alfa (40,000 U QW) appear to achieve comparable clinical and hematologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15561813     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  10 in total

1.  Resource utilisation and time commitment associated with correction of anaemia in cancer patients using epoetin alfa.

Authors:  Kenneth R Meehan; N Simon Tchekmedyian; Robert E Smith; Joel Kallich
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Thomy Tonia; Annette Mettler; Nadège Robert; Guido Schwarzer; Jerome Seidenfeld; Olaf Weingart; Chris Hyde; Andreas Engert; Julia Bohlius
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

3.  Economic evaluation of weekly epoetin alfa versus biweekly darbepoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anaemia: evidence from a 16-week randomised trial.

Authors:  Shelby D Reed; Jasmina I Radeva; Davey B Daniel; Samir H Mody; Jamie B Forlenza; R Scott McKenzie; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Supportive care for patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura García-Estévez; Ignasi Tusquets; Isabel Alvarez; César Rodríguez; Yolanda Fernández; Miguel Angel Seguí; Jesús García-Mata; Ana Lluch
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer--meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  Julia Bohlius; Kurt Schmidlin; Corinne Brillant; Guido Schwarzer; Sven Trelle; Jerome Seidenfeld; Marcel Zwahlen; Mike J Clarke; Olaf Weingart; Sabine Kluge; Margaret Piper; Maryann Napoli; Dirk Rades; David Steensma; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Martin F Fey; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Volker Moebus; Gillian Thomas; Michael Untch; Martin Schumacher; Matthias Egger; Andreas Engert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

6.  Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) : a registry for characterizing anaemia management and outcomes in oncology patients.

Authors:  Kay Larholt; Chris L Pashos; Qin Wang; Brahim Bookhart; R Scott McKenzie; Catherine Tak Piech
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Darbepoetin versus epoetin alfa for the correction of anemia in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Pilar Ma Samper Ots; Concepción López Carrizosa; Aurora Rodríguez Pérez; Juan de Dios Saez Garrido; José Ma Delgado Pérez
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2008-05-19

8.  Darbepoetin alpha in the treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Authors:  Alberto Grossi; Francesca Balestri; Simone Santini
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Phase 2, single-arm trial to evaluate the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for correcting anaemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Janice Gabrilove; Ronald Paquette; Roger M Lyons; Chaudhry Mushtaq; Mikkael A Sekeres; Dianne Tomita; Lyndah Dreiling
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Phase II study of two dose schedules of C.E.R.A. (Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator) in anemic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Vera Hirsh; John Glaspy; Paul Mainwaring; Christian Manegold; Rodryg Ramlau; Joseph E Eid
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.