Literature DB >> 15561301

Axonal excitability revisited.

John R Clay1.   

Abstract

The original papers of Hodgkin and Huxley (J. Physiol. 116 (1952a) 449, J. Physiol. 116 (1952b) 473, J. Physiol. 116 (1952c) 497, J. Physiol. 117 (1952d) 500) have provided a benchmark in our understanding of cellular excitability. Not surprisingly, their model of the membrane action potential (AP) requires revisions even for the squid giant axon, the preparation for which it was originally formulated. The mechanisms they proposed for the voltage-gated potassium and sodium ion currents, IK, and INa, respectively, have been superceded by more recent formulations that more accurately describe voltage-clamp measurements of these components. Moreover, the current-voltage relation for IK has a non-linear dependence upon driving force that is well described by the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) relation, rather than the linear dependence on driving force found by Hodgkin and Huxley. Furthermore, accumulation of potassium ions in the extracellular space adjacent to the axolemma appears to be significant even during a single AP. This paper describes the influence of these various modifications in their model on the mathematically reconstructed AP. The GHK and K+ accumulation results alter the shape of the AP, whereas the modifications in IK and INa gating have surprisingly little effect. Perhaps the most significant change in their model concerns the amplitude of INa, which they appear to have overestimated by a factor of two. This modification together with the GHK and the K+ accumulation results largely remove the discrepancies between membrane excitability of the squid giant axon and the Hodgkin and Huxley (J. Physiol. 117 (1952d) 500) model previously described (Clay, J. Neurophysiol. 80 (1998) 903).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15561301     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  9 in total

1.  Developmental changes in potassium currents at the rat calyx of Held presynaptic terminal.

Authors:  Yukihiro Nakamura; Tomoyuki Takahashi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A simple modification of the Hodgkin and Huxley equations explains type 3 excitability in squid giant axons.

Authors:  John R Clay; David Paydarfar; Daniel B Forger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Action potentials in primary osteoblasts and in the MG-63 osteoblast-like cell line.

Authors:  Maria Pangalos; Willem Bintig; Barbara Schlingmann; Frank Feyerabend; Frank Witte; Daniela Begandt; Alexander Heisterkamp; Anaclet Ngezahayo
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.945

4.  The impact of the glial spatial buffering on the K(+) Nernst potential.

Authors:  H R Noori
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Evolution and comparative genomics of subcellular specializations: EST sequencing of Torpedo electric organ.

Authors:  Javad Nazarian; Deborah L Berry; Salar Sanjari; Mohammed Razvi; Kristy Brown; Yetrib Hathout; Akos Vertes; Sherry Dadgar; Eric P Hoffman
Journal:  Mar Genomics       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 6.  The what and where of adding channel noise to the Hodgkin-Huxley equations.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Modulating RhoA effectors induces transitions to oscillatory and more wavelike RhoA dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans zygotes.

Authors:  Baixue Yao; Seth Donoughe; Jonathan Michaux; Edwin Munro
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Identifying a kinase network regulating FGF14:Nav1.6 complex assembly using split-luciferase complementation.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Hsu; Miroslav N Nenov; Alexander Shavkunov; Neli Panova; Ming Zhan; Fernanda Laezza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of the temporal variation of electrical potential and pH of different bleaching agents.

Authors:  Hermes Pretel; Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes Costa; Fernando Luis Esteban Florez; Básia Rabelo Nogueira; Osmir Batista de Oliveira Junior
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-11-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.