Literature DB >> 15559684

Perspectives on the drug court model across systems: a process evaluation.

Ellen L Wolfe1, Joseph Guydish, William Woods, Barbara Tajima.   

Abstract

Drug courts have been in existence since 1989, yet few process evaluations have appeared in the literature to help inform the discussion about their effectiveness. This article reports findings from a process evaluation of a drug court program in San Mateo, California. The evaluation was designed to document the history of the program, to examine program strengths and areas of improvement, to assess the roles and relationships among the various agencies involved and to describe the impact of the drug court on the justice and drug treatment systems. Methods included review of available drug court program documents, interviews with key stakeholders, and focus groups with drug court participants. The main findings were: support for the continuation of drug court, enhanced collaboration among all agencies, and an increased awareness of the needs of substance-using clients in the criminal justice system. Potential lessons for other drug courts include the importance of building strong collaborations and maintaining good communication, recognizing competing interests in developing procedures for drug court, and considering changes in eligibility criteria as experience with the drug court model expands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15559684      PMCID: PMC3347910          DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2004.10400037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs        ISSN: 0279-1072


  3 in total

1.  Drug court effectiveness: a review of California evaluation reports, 1995-1999.

Authors:  J Guydish; E Wolfe; B Tajima; W J Woods
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec

2.  A Drug Court Outcome Evaluation Comparing Arrests in a Two Year Follow-up Period.

Authors:  Joseph R Guydish
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2002-09

3.  An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The Addiction Severity Index.

Authors:  A T McLellan; L Luborsky; G E Woody; C P O'Brien
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.254

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; M Douglas Anglin; Darren Urada; Joy Yang
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-09-29

2.  Pharmacy stakeholder reports on ethical and logistical considerations in anti-opioid vaccine development.

Authors:  Vincent Wartenweiler; Grace Chung; Amy Stewart; Cody Wenthur
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.