Literature DB >> 15558916

A systematic approach to managing hypertension and the metabolic syndrome in primary care.

William H Bestermann1, Daniel T Lackland, Jessica E Riehle, Brent M Egan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Obesity is driving a high prevalence of hypertension and metabolic syndrome-related risk and disease. This report summarizes the impact of a standardized, evidence-based approach to managing high blood pressure and associated metabolic syndrome abnormalities that was developed and implemented by one Clinical Hypertension Specialist.
METHODS: Longitudinal data on blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, and treatment medications were obtained on all 817 hypertensive patients seen from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2003.
RESULTS: The hypertensive patients were 72 +/- 11 (SD) years old, and more than 55% of them were high risk based on target organ damage, clinical cardiovascular disease, or diabetes mellitus. Blood pressure was < 140/90 mm Hg in 77% of all patients. Among the high-risk patients, mean blood pressure was 126 +/- 14/71 +/- 10 on 2.8 +/- 1.4 antihypertensive medications, with 88% on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, 59% on diuretics, 49% on calcium channel blockers, and 36% on beta-blockers. Among dyslipidemic hypertensives, LDL-C was controlled to < 130 mg/dL in 84% (510/605) overall and to < 100 mg/dL in 70% of the high-risk group (299/427). Among diabetic hypertensives, the mean HbA1c was 6.8%, with 64% (155/242) less than 7%. New patients demonstrated improved blood pressure, LDL-C, and hemoglobin A1c control over time as the management algorithm was applied.
CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of complicated hypertension was documented. Blood pressure, LDL-C, and HbA1c were controlled to goal in a high proportion of patients. The findings demonstrate that application of an evidence-based management algorithm can facilitate higher rates of cardiovascular risk factor control than are generally reported in primary care practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15558916     DOI: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000129923.83896.CC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  4 in total

1.  [Evaluation and control of hypertensive diabetics seen in Primary Care centres in Spain. BRAND II study].

Authors:  José Abellán Alemán; Miguel Ángel Prieto Díaz; Mariano Leal Hernández; Serafín Balanza Galindo; Alex de la Sierra Iserte; Nieves Martell Claros; Fernando García Romanos
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Impacting population cardiovascular health through a community-based practice network: update on an ASH-supported collaborative.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Marilyn A Laken; C Shaun Wagner; Sheryl S Mack; Kim Seymour-Edwards; John Dodson; Yumin Zhao; Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Cardiovascular risk factor control in communities--update from the ASH Carolinas-Georgia Chapter, the Hypertension Initiative, and the Community Physicians' Network.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Daniel T Lackland; Priscilla Igho-Pemu; Katharine H Hendrix; Jan Basile; Shakaib U Rehman; Eni C Okonofua; Alexander Quarshie; Adefisayo Oduwole; Anekwe Onwuanyi; James Reed; Chamberlain Obialo; Elizabeth O Ofili
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  The COSEHC™ Global Vascular Risk Management quality improvement program: first follow-up report.

Authors:  Carlos M Ferrario; Janae Joyner; Chris Colby; Alex Exuzides; Michael Moore; Debra Simmons; William Bestermann; Feride Frech-Tamas
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-07-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.