Literature DB >> 15558369

A comparative study of the effects of electrical stimulation and laser treatment on experimental wound healing in rats.

Hüseyin Demir1, Halil Balay, Mehmet Kirnap.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of electrical stimulation (ES) and laser treatment on wound healing in rats. A randomized-controlled trial, conducted at the Experimental and Clinical Research Centre of Erciyes University (Kayseri, Turkey), divided 124 healthy female Swiss-Albino rats into four groups. A 6 cm linear incision was made at the dorsal skin of all rats. Group 1 was given a constant direct current of 300 microA for 30 min per day. The current was applied in negative polarity for the first 3 days and in positive polarity for the next 7 days. Group 3 received a full-contact, continuous gallium-arsenide (GaAs) laser therapy, with a wavelength of 904 nm, an energy density of 1 J/cm2, and an average power of 6 mW for 10 min per day. The remaining two groups (Groups 2 and 4) were considered the control groups and received sham treatment. All groups were treated for 10 days. Histopathologic and biochemical evaluations were conducted on 10 rats from each group on the 4th and 10th days, and wound breaking strength was measured for biomechanical evaluation on the 25th day of the study. Both ES and laser treatment proved significantly effective in the inflammatory phase compared with control groups (p < 0.05); however, the ES was even more effective than laser treatment, with more significant results (p < 0.05). In the proliferation and maturation phases, while ES and laser treatment were both found to be significantly effective treatment methods compared with the control groups, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment groups (p > 0.05). Although ES and laser treatment both were effective in the maturation phase, increasing wound breaking strength compared with their control groups (p < 0.05), there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups (p > 0.05). We conclude that ES and laser treatment both have beneficial effects during the inflammatory, proliferation, and maturation phases of a wound. Both ES and laser treatment can be used successfully in decubitis ulcers and chronic wounds, in combination with conventional therapies such as daily care and debridement of wounds; however, ES has more beneficial effects during the inflammatory phase in some parameters than laser treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15558369     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.02.0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  14 in total

1.  In vitro electrical-stimulated wound-healing chip for studying electric field-assisted wound-healing process.

Authors:  Yung-Shin Sun; Shih-Wei Peng; Ji-Yen Cheng
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Correlation between cell migration and reactive oxygen species under electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Shang-Ying Wu; Hsien-San Hou; Yung-Shin Sun; Ji-Yen Cheng; Kai-Yin Lo
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Wound healing efficacy of a 660-nm diode laser in a rat incisional wound model.

Authors:  Ryoichi Suzuki; Kazuo Takakuda
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Electrical Stimulation of Wound Healing: A Review of Animal Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Giti Torkaman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Low level diode laser accelerates wound healing.

Authors:  Munqith S Dawood; Saif Dawood Salman
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  The effect of low-level helium-neon laser on oral wound healing.

Authors:  Farimah Sardari; Farzaneh Ahrari
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

7.  Electrical Shunting Prevents the Decline of Galvanotaxis After Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation in Human Dermal Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mikiko Uemura; Masaharu Sugimoto; Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa; Rieko Inoue
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-07-12

8.  The effect of magnetic field therapy and electric stimulation on experimental burn healing.

Authors:  Yaşar Keskin; Nurettin Taştekin; Mehmet Kanter; Hüsamettin Top; Ferda Özdemir; Mustafa Erboğa; Özgür Taşpınar; Necdet Süt
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-22

9.  Long-term histological comparison between near-infrared irradiated skin and scar tissues.

Authors:  Yohei Tanaka; Kiyoshi Matsuo; Shunsuke Yuzuriha
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2010-11-25

10.  A Comparison Study of Growth Factor Expression following Treatment with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Saline Solution, Povidone-Iodine, and Lavender Oil in Wounds Healing.

Authors:  Adalet Koca Kutlu; Dilek Ceçen; Seren Gülşen Gürgen; Oya Sayın; Ferihan Cetin
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.