Literature DB >> 15558367

Comparison of manual and computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch-matching.

James A Henry1, Christopher L Flick, Alison Gilbert, Roger M Ellingson, Stephen A Fausti.   

Abstract

Clinical assessment of tinnitus usually includes pitch-matching between the tinnitus and a pure tone. Although such testing is performed routinely, response reliability has not been demonstrated yet. The present study continues a series of studies designed to develop automated methodology for quantifying tinnitus perceptual characteristics. Three methods for tinnitus pitch-matching were performed in a group of 42 subjects. Two methods were computer-automated (Binary and Subject-Guided) and the third method was a traditional manual technique. Each method provided excellent response reliability for about half of the subjects. The most reliable subjects, however, differed widely between the different methods. Each subject provided a total of 14 pitch matches using the three different methods. Analyses based on each subject's total of 14 pitch matches revealed the range of pitch matches for each subject. About half of the subjects selected pitch matches over a range of 2 1/3 octaves. Results of this study suggest that specifying the range of tinnitus pitch matches rather than attempting to identify a single pitch match may be more appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15558367     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.02.0121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  10 in total

1.  Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.

Authors:  Sylvie Hébert
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Does tinnitus "fill in" the silent gaps?

Authors:  Jennifer Campolo; Edward Lobarinas; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

Review 3.  Maladaptive neural synchrony in tinnitus: origin and restoration.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont; Peter A Tass
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Changes in the response properties of inferior colliculus neurons relating to tinnitus.

Authors:  Joel I Berger; Ben Coomber; Tobias T Wells; Mark N Wallace; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Clinical trial on tonal tinnitus with tailor-made notched music training.

Authors:  Alwina Stein; Robert Wunderlich; Pia Lau; Alva Engell; Andreas Wollbrink; Alex Shaykevich; Jörg-Tobias Kuhn; Heinz Holling; Claudia Rudack; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Comparing Three Established Methods for Tinnitus Pitch Matching With Respect to Reliability, Matching Duration, and Subjective Satisfaction.

Authors:  Patrick Neff; Berthold Langguth; Martin Schecklmann; Ronny Hannemann; Winfried Schlee
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Automated migration analysis based on cell texture: method & reliability.

Authors:  Jianfeng Qin; Thomas W Chittenden; Ling Gao; Justin D Pearlman
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Study protocol: Münster tinnitus randomized controlled clinical trial-2013 based on tailor-made notched music training (TMNMT).

Authors:  Christo Pantev; Claudia Rudack; Alwina Stein; Robert Wunderlich; Alva Engell; Pia Lau; Andreas Wollbrink; Alex Shaykevich
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Neural changes accompanying tinnitus following unilateral acoustic trauma in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Ben Coomber; Joel I Berger; Victoria L Kowalkowski; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer; Mark N Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Comparing Tinnitus Tuning Curves and Psychoacoustic Tuning Curves.

Authors:  Philippe Fournier; Malgorzata Wrzosek; Michel Paolino; Fabien Paolino; Anne Quemar; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.