Literature DB >> 15558254

Role of the cerebellum in movements: control of timing or movement transitions?

Rebecca M C Spencer1, Richard B Ivry, Howard N Zelaznik.   

Abstract

Patients with cerebellar damage are impaired on a range of timed tasks. However, recent research has indicated that the impairment on temporal production tasks is limited to discontinuous movements. The present experiments were designed to compare two accounts for the increased temporal variability observed in these patients when producing discontinuous movements. First, the impairment on discontinuous movements may be the result of the requirements associated with transitioning between movement onsets and offsets, requirements unique to discontinuous movement production. Second, the impairment may reflect a requirement to represent the temporal goal in timed, discontinuous movements. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cerebellar lesions and matched control subjects performed a key-pressing task. In one condition, the participants pressed and immediately released the key. The other conditions required the participants to press the key, and after either a 550-ms or 950-ms delay, release the key. Individuals with cerebellar damage were impaired on the two timed conditions. These results do not support the transition hypothesis. Rather, they are consistent with the hypothesis that the cerebellum is essential for tasks requiring precise event-like temporal control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15558254     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2088-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

Review 1.  Computer simulation of cerebellar information processing.

Authors:  J F Medina; M D Mauk
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Causes of left-right ball inaccuracy in overarm throws made by cerebellar patients.

Authors:  D Timmann; S Watts; J Hore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control.

Authors:  S D Robertson; H N Zelaznik; D A Lantero; K G Bojczyk; R M Spencer; J G Doffin; T Schneidt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability.

Authors:  H N Zelaznik; R M Spencer; J G Doffin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  The Timing Effects of Accent Production in Periodic Finger-Tapping Sequences.

Authors:  M. Billon; A. Semjen; G. E. Stelmach
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution.

Authors:  R B Ivry; S W Keele; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism.

Authors:  R B Ivry; R E Hazeltine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Cerebellar participation in generation of prompt arm movements.

Authors:  J Meyer-Lohmann; J Hore; V B Brooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effects of dentate cooling on rapid alternating arm movements.

Authors:  B Conrad; V B Brooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  EMG analysis of patients with cerebellar deficits.

Authors:  M Hallett; B T Shahani; R R Young
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  24 in total

1.  Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: probing the relationship between event and emergent timing.

Authors:  Howard N Zelaznik; Rebecca M C Spencer; Richard B Ivry; Alex Baria; Melissa Bloom; Lisa Dolansky; Shannon Justice; Kristen Patterson; Emily Whetter
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 2.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

Review 3.  Coupling between cerebellar hemispheres: behavioural, anatomic, and functional data.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Markus Butz; Joachim Gross; Martin Südmeyer; Lars Timmermann; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Cerebellar activation during discrete and not continuous timed movements: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Rebecca M C Spencer; Timothy Verstynen; Matthew Brett; Richard Ivry
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Neural correlates of simple unimanual discrete and continuous movements: a functional imaging study at 3 T.

Authors:  Christophe Habas; Emmanuel Alain Cabanis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Influence of ankle loading on the relationship between temporal pressure and motor coordination during a whole-body paired task.

Authors:  Eric Yiou; Tarek Hussein; Jacques LaRue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Generalized motor abilities and timing behavior in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Howard N Zelaznik; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Neuromagnetic Cerebellar Activity Entrains to the Kinematics of Executed Finger Movements.

Authors:  Brice Marty; V Wens; M Bourguignon; G Naeije; S Goldman; V Jousmäki; X De Tiège
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Deficits in Coordinative Bimanual Timing Precision in Children With Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Janet Vuolo; Lisa Goffman; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Rhythmic arm movements are less affected than discrete ones after a stroke.

Authors:  Patricia Leconte; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Gaëtan Stoquart; Thierry Lejeune; Renaud Ronsse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.