Literature DB >> 15557951

Endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the duodenal papillae.

Chi-Liang Cheng1, Stuart Sherman, Evan L Fogel, Lee McHenry, James L Watkins, Toyomi Fukushima, Thomas J Howard, Laura Lazzell-Pannell, Glen A Lehman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumors of the major and the minor duodenal papillae can be malignant or premalignant, and traditionally are treated by surgical excision. This study evaluated the safety and the outcome of endoscopic snare resection of such tumors.
METHODS: All patients with tumors of the major or the minor papilla treated by endoscopic snare resection over a 10-year period (1994-2003) were identified from an ERCP database. Patients with tumors that had endoscopic features of malignancy and those proven to be cancerous by biopsy were excluded. Papillectomy was performed by electrosurgical snare resection. A pancreatic stent usually was placed before or after excision. Residual tumor was eradicated by repeated procedures. Endoscopic surveillance was at the discretion of the endoscopist.
RESULTS: Seventy snare resections were performed in 55 patients (mean age 59 years). Histopathologic diagnoses were the following: adenoma (45 patients; 7 with focal high-grade dysplasia, 6 with intraductal extension), adenocarcinoma (5), carcinoid tumor (2), gastric heterotopia (1), and normal histology (2). Fourteen patients had familial adenomatous polyposis. Of the 39 patients with isolated extraductal adenoma per cholangiogram, two underwent surgical resection because of persistent high-grade dysplasia, and 37 were successfully treated by endoscopic papillectomy alone. During follow-up (mean 30 months), 18 of 37 patients (49%) had no recurrence, 7 had recurrent adenoma (mean time interval to recurrence 27 months), two died of unrelated illnesses, and 10 are awaiting follow-up. Of the 6 patients with intraductal adenoma per cholangiogram, two underwent surgical resection, two had intraductal photodynamic therapy, and two had endoscopic snare resection. Intraductal tumor in the 4 latter patients was eliminated, although it recurred in one of the patients who had photodynamic therapy. Of the 7 patients with adenocarcinoma or carcinoid tumor, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 3 and palliative papillectomy was performed in 4 unsuitable for surgery. One patient with carcinoid tumor of the minor papilla is alive, without recurrence, at 5 years after papillectomy. There were 10 procedure-related complications (14.5%), including pancreatitis (5), bleeding (4), and mild perforation (1). There was no procedure-related death.
CONCLUSIONS: Most adenomas of the duodenal papillae without intraductal extension can be fully resected by snare papillectomy. However, adenoma recurs in about a third of patients. Endoscopic therapy appears to be a reasonable alternative to surgery for management of papillary tumors. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the true recurrence rate and if endoscopic re-treatments are effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15557951     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02029-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  62 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions.

Authors:  Jesús Espinel; Eugenia Pinedo; Vanesa Ojeda; Maria Guerra Del Rio
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-09-26

2.  Endoscopic resection of carcinoid of the minor duodenal papilla.

Authors:  Takao Itoi; Atsushi Sofuni; Fumihide Itokawa; Takayoshi Tsuchiya; Toshio Kurihara; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Minimizing complications in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy.

Authors:  Olga Barkay; Mouen Khashab; Mohammad Al-Haddad; Evan L Fogel
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-04

4.  Endoscopic ampullectomy: a practical guide.

Authors:  Milan Bassan; Michael Bourke
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-01

5.  Endoscopic resection of ampullary lesions: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Wim Laleman; Annelies Verreth; Baki Topal; Raymond Aerts; Mina Komuta; Tania Roskams; Schalk Van der Merwe; David Cassiman; Frederik Nevens; Chris Verslype; Werner Van Steenbergen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Johnathon Springer; Robert Enns; Joseph Romagnuolo; Terry Ponich; Alan N Barkun; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Quality indicators for ERCP.

Authors:  Douglas G Adler; John G Lieb; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; James M Scheiman; Nicholas J Shaheen; Stuart Sherman; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Endoscopic papillectomy: indications, techniques, and results.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Endoscopic papillectomy: risk factors for incomplete resection and recurrence during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Damien Tan; Suzette E Schmidt; Evan L Fogel; Lee McHenry; James L Watkins; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Targeting tissue factor on tumour cells and angiogenic vascular endothelial cells by factor VII-targeted verteporfin photodynamic therapy for breast cancer in vitro and in vivo in mice.

Authors:  Zhiwei Hu; Benqiang Rao; Shimin Chen; Jinzhong Duanmu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.