Literature DB >> 15557853

Spatial compression and adaptation with the low vision telescope.

Dina Shah1, H A Sedgwick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Geometrical analysis of monocular visual information specifying distance shows that a low vision telescope compresses optically specified distances by a factor about equal to its magnification. Using a group of eight visually healthy adults, we investigated the initial perceptual effect of putting on a 2x Galilean telescope and the adaptation produced by wearing the telescope.
METHODS: Viewing was monocular, and the environment was only visible through the telescope. Because the telescope reduced the field of view to 13 degrees , we also tested a different group of eight visually normal adults who wore a simple monocular tube that restricted the field of view to 13 degrees . We measured perceived distance in a corridor using a visually directed open-loop walking task with distances ranging from 4 to 8 m. For both groups, monocular distance perception was measured before putting on the viewing device (baseline), immediately after putting on the viewing device (preadaptation), after wearing the viewing device during a 30-minute period of visual-motor activities (postadaptation), and immediately after taking off the viewing device (aftereffect).
RESULTS: Comparing preadaptation with baseline measurements, the viewing devices produced a 15.4% initial compression of perceived distance on average. Comparing aftereffect with baseline measurements, the adaptation period produced a negative aftereffect that was 56.5% of the initial compression, thus showing substantial adaptation. The initial compression and the adaptation were highly significant effects, but neither effect was significantly different for the telescope group and the tube group.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that free head movements in a structured environment can largely overcome the optically specified compression of distance produced by the 2x magnification of a low vision telescope, but there remains a significant initial compression of perceived distance that is produced by the restricted field of view. This compression can be substantially reduced by a short period of interaction with the environment.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15557853     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200410000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  2 in total

1.  Inaccurate representation of the ground surface beyond a texture boundary.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Direct manipulation of perceived angular declination affects perceived size and distance: a replication and extension of Wallach and O'Leary (1982).

Authors:  Morgan J C Williams; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.