Literature DB >> 15557778

Predictors of delayed therapy after expectant management for localized prostate cancer in the era of prostate-specific antigen.

Irene Panagiotou1, Tomasz M Beer, Yi-Ching Hsieh, Motomi Mori, Laura Peters, Thomas Klein, Mark Garzotto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for delayed cancer-directed intervention in modern era prostate cancer patients who initially elect expectant management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, cohort study of expectantly managed patients, diagnosed with clinical T(1-4)NxM0 prostate cancer between 1993 and 2000 was carried out. Data including TNM stage, age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound, Gleason score, percent biopsies positive for cancer, imaging results, initial treatment selection, and outcome data were collected on all patients.
RESULTS: 192 of 561 patients (34.3%) elected expectant management, and follow-up data were available for 187 (97.4%) patients. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 90 (48.1%) patients had a cancer-directed intervention. Gleason score (p = 0.0097) and percent of positive biopsy cores (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of time to intervention. As expected, PSA doubling time became the most significant predictor of intervention (p = 0.0057) when added to the model. These independent covariates are able to characterize low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups for cancer-directed intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer-directed intervention is common in patients who choose expectant management in the PSA era. Gleason score and percent of positive biopsy cores predict cancer-directed interventions, thus, these patients may be least suitable for expectant management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15557778     DOI: 10.1159/000081317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Selection criteria for the expected management of localised prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; G Salomon; E Currlin; C Eichelberg; T Schlomm; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.