Literature DB >> 15557676

Does mercury promote lipid peroxidation? An in vitro study concerning mercury, copper, and iron in peroxidation of low-density lipoprotein.

Kari Seppänen1, Pasi Soininen, Jukka T Salonen, Simo Lötjönen, Reino Laatikainen.   

Abstract

In order to explore the observed association among mercury, atherosclerosis, and coronary heart disease, the effects of mercury, copper, and iron on the peroxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and on the enzymatic activities of glutathione peroxidase and myeloperoxidase were investigated in vitro. On the basis of our nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments, we conclude that mercury does not promote the direct nonenzymatic peroxidation of LDL, like copper and iron. In our enzyme measurements, mercury inhibited slightly myeloperoxidase, although not significantly in presence of LDL. Instead, inorganic mercury, but not methylmercury chloride, inhibited glutathione peroxidase effectively and copper even at 10 micromol/L, below physiological concentrations, doubled the inhibition rate. Copper and iron had no direct effect on glutathione peroxidase, but they both seem to activate production of HOCl by myeloperoxidase. We conclude here that, first, mercury and methylmercury do not promote direct lipid peroxidation, but that, second, a simultaneous exposure to high inorganic mercury, copper, and iron and low selenium concentrations can lead to a condition in which mercury promotes lipid peroxidations. This mechanism provides a plausible molecular-level explanation for the observed association between high body mercury content and atherosclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15557676     DOI: 10.1385/BTER:101:2:117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res        ISSN: 0163-4984            Impact factor:   3.738


  13 in total

1.  Selenium and mercury molar ratios in saltwater fish from New Jersey: individual and species variability complicate use in human health fish consumption advisories.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Selenium and mercury molar ratios in commercial fish from New Jersey and Illinois: variation within species and relevance to risk communication.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.023

3.  On the chalcogenophilicity of mercury: evidence for a strong Hg-Se bond in [Tm(Bu(t))]HgSePh and its relevance to the toxicity of mercury.

Authors:  Jonathan G Melnick; Kevin Yurkerwich; Gerard Parkin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Protective Effect of Nanoselenium on Renal Oxidative Damage Induced by Mercury in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Binyao Cheng; Yumeng Li; Zhuosi Wang; Xiang Li; Ao Ren; Qiujue Wu; Doudou Zhu; Bingbing Ren
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Selenium and mercury in the Brazilian Amazon: opposing influences on age-related cataracts.

Authors:  Mélanie Lemire; Myriam Fillion; Benoît Frenette; Annie Mayer; Aline Philibert; Carlos José Sousa Passos; Jean Rémy Davée Guimarães; Fernando Júnior Barbosa; Donna Mergler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Selenium health benefit values as seafood safety criteria.

Authors:  Nicholas V C Ralston
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 7.  Evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of methylmercury exposures: current evidence supports development of a dose-response function for regulatory benefits analysis.

Authors:  Henry A Roman; Tyra L Walsh; Brent A Coull; Éric Dewailly; Eliseo Guallar; Dale Hattis; Koenraad Mariën; Joel Schwartz; Alan H Stern; Jyrki K Virtanen; Glenn Rice
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Cerebral gene expression in response to single or combined gestational exposure to methylmercury and selenium through the maternal diet.

Authors:  Shalini Jayashankar; Chris N Glover; Kristin I Folven; Trond Brattelid; Christer Hogstrand; Anne-Katrine Lundebye
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.691

9.  Biochemical factors modulating cellular neurotoxicity of methylmercury.

Authors:  Parvinder Kaur; Michael Aschner; Tore Syversen
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2011-09-20

10.  Interspecific and locational differences in metal levels in edible fish tissue from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Zenon Batang; Nabeel Alikunhi; Ramzi Al-Jahdali; Dalal Al-Jebreen; Mohammed A M Aziz; Abdulaziz Al-Suwailem
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.