BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a novel coronavirus. It may progress to respiratory failure, and a significant proportion of patients die. Preliminary data suggest that a high viral load of the SARS coronavirus is associated with adverse outcomes in the intensive care unit, but the relation of viral load to survival is unclear. METHODS: We prospectively studied an inception cohort of 133 patients with virologically confirmed SARS who were admitted to 2 general acute care hospitals in Hong Kong from Mar. 24 to May 4, 2003. The patients were followed until death or for a minimum of 90 days. We used Cox proportional hazard modelling to analyze potential predictors of survival recorded at the time of presentation, including viral load from nasopharyngeal specimens (measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [PCR] of the SARS-associated coronavirus). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (24.1%) met the criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 24 patients (18.0%) died. The following baseline factors were independently associated with worse survival: older age (61-80 years) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-13.53), presence of an active comorbid condition (adjusted HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.44-7.82) and higher initial viral load of SARS coronavirus, according to quantitative PCR of nasopharyngeal specimens (adjusted HR 1.21 per log10 increase in number of RNA copies per millilitre, 95% CI 1.06-1.39). INTERPRETATION: We found preliminary evidence that higher initial viral load is independently associated with worse prognosis in SARS. Mortality data for patients with SARS should be interpreted in light of age, comorbidity and viral load. These considerations will be important in future studies of SARS.
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a novel coronavirus. It may progress to respiratory failure, and a significant proportion of patients die. Preliminary data suggest that a high viral load of the SARS coronavirus is associated with adverse outcomes in the intensive care unit, but the relation of viral load to survival is unclear. METHODS: We prospectively studied an inception cohort of 133 patients with virologically confirmed SARS who were admitted to 2 general acute care hospitals in Hong Kong from Mar. 24 to May 4, 2003. The patients were followed until death or for a minimum of 90 days. We used Cox proportional hazard modelling to analyze potential predictors of survival recorded at the time of presentation, including viral load from nasopharyngeal specimens (measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [PCR] of the SARS-associated coronavirus). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (24.1%) met the criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 24 patients (18.0%) died. The following baseline factors were independently associated with worse survival: older age (61-80 years) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-13.53), presence of an active comorbid condition (adjusted HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.44-7.82) and higher initial viral load of SARS coronavirus, according to quantitative PCR of nasopharyngeal specimens (adjusted HR 1.21 per log10 increase in number of RNA copies per millilitre, 95% CI 1.06-1.39). INTERPRETATION: We found preliminary evidence that higher initial viral load is independently associated with worse prognosis in SARS. Mortality data for patients with SARS should be interpreted in light of age, comorbidity and viral load. These considerations will be important in future studies of SARS.
Authors: Christopher M Booth; Larissa M Matukas; George A Tomlinson; Anita R Rachlis; David B Rose; Hy A Dwosh; Sharon L Walmsley; Tony Mazzulli; Monica Avendano; Peter Derkach; Issa E Ephtimios; Ian Kitai; Barbara D Mederski; Steven B Shadowitz; Wayne L Gold; Laura A Hawryluck; Elizabeth Rea; Jordan S Chenkin; David W Cescon; Susan M Poutanen; Allan S Detsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Raymond S M Wong; Alan Wu; K F To; Nelson Lee; Christopher W K Lam; C K Wong; Paul K S Chan; Margaret H L Ng; L M Yu; David S Hui; John S Tam; Gregory Cheng; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-06-21
Authors: Leo L M Poon; On Kei Wong; Kwok Hung Chan; Winsie Luk; Kwok Yung Yuen; Joseph S M Peiris; Yi Guan Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Enders K O Ng; David S Hui; K C Allen Chan; Emily C W Hung; Rossa W K Chiu; Nelson Lee; Alan Wu; Stephen S C Chim; Yu K Tong; Joseph J Y Sung; John S Tam; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: J S M Peiris; C M Chu; V C C Cheng; K S Chan; I F N Hung; L L M Poon; K I Law; B S F Tang; T Y W Hon; C S Chan; K H Chan; J S C Ng; B J Zheng; W L Ng; R W M Lai; Y Guan; K Y Yuen Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thijs Kuiken; Ron A M Fouchier; Martin Schutten; Guus F Rimmelzwaan; Geert van Amerongen; Debby van Riel; Jon D Laman; Ton de Jong; Gerard van Doornum; Wilina Lim; Ai Ee Ling; Paul K S Chan; John S Tam; Maria C Zambon; Robin Gopal; Christian Drosten; Sylvie van der Werf; Nicolas Escriou; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Klaus Stöhr; J S Malik Peiris; Albert D M E Osterhaus Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John M Nicholls; Leo L M Poon; Kam C Lee; Wai F Ng; Sik T Lai; Chung Y Leung; Chung M Chu; Pak K Hui; Kong L Mak; Wilina Lim; Kin W Yan; Kwok H Chan; Ngai C Tsang; Yi Guan; Kwok Y Yuen; J S Malik Peiris Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: V C C Cheng; I F N Hung; B S F Tang; C M Chu; M M L Wong; K H Chan; A K L Wu; D M W Tse; K S Chan; B J Zheng; J S M Peiris; J J Y Sung; K Y Yuen Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-01-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Ron A M Fouchier; Thijs Kuiken; Martin Schutten; Geert van Amerongen; Gerard J J van Doornum; Bernadette G van den Hoogen; Malik Peiris; Wilina Lim; Klaus Stöhr; Albert D M E Osterhaus Journal: Nature Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Leo L M Poon; Bonnie W Y Wong; Kwok H Chan; Stella S F Ng; Kwok Y Yuen; Yi Guan; J S Malik Peiris Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: P A Tuan; P Horby; P N Dinh; L T Q Mai; M Zambon; J Shah; V Q Huy; S Bloom; R Gopal; J Comer; A Plant Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2006-07-26 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Boyd Yount; Rhonda S Roberts; Amy C Sims; Damon Deming; Matthew B Frieman; Jennifer Sparks; Mark R Denison; Nancy Davis; Ralph S Baric Journal: J Virol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Marta L DeDiego; Enrique Alvarez; Fernando Almazán; María Teresa Rejas; Elaine Lamirande; Anjeanette Roberts; Wun-Ju Shieh; Sherif R Zaki; Kanta Subbarao; Luis Enjuanes Journal: J Virol Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Maciej M Kowalik; Piotr Trzonkowski; Magdalena Łasińska-Kowara; Andrzej Mital; Tomasz Smiatacz; Miłosz Jaguszewski Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Luis Enjuanes; Marta L Dediego; Enrique Alvarez; Damon Deming; Tim Sheahan; Ralph Baric Journal: Virus Res Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 3.303