BACKGROUND: Because of rapid changes in myocardial intracellular Na+ (Na+(i)) during ischemia and reperfusion (R), 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appears to be an ideal diagnostic modality for early detection of myocardial ischemia and viability. So far, cardiac 23Na MRI data are limited and mostly concerned with imaging of total Na+. For proper interpretation, imaging of both Na+(i) and extracellular Na+ is essential. In this study, we tested whether Na+(i) imaging can be used to assess viability after low-flow (LF) ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolated rat hearts were subjected to LF (1%, 2%, or 3% of control coronary flow) and R. A shift reagent was used to separate Na+(i) and extracellular Na+ resonances. Acquisition-weighted 23Na chemical shift imaging (CSI) was alternated with 23Na MR spectroscopy. Already during control perfusion, Na+(i) could be clearly seen on the images. Na+(i) image intensity increased with increasing severity of ischemia. During R, Na+(i) image intensity remained highest in 1% LF hearts. Not only did we find very good correlations between Na+(i) image intensity at end-R and end-diastolic pressure (R=0.85, P<0.001) and recovery of the rate-pressure product (R=-0.88, P<0.001) at end-R, but most interestingly, also Na+(i) image intensity at end-LF was well correlated with end-diastolic pressure (R=0.78, P<0.01) and with recovery of the rate-pressure product (R=-0.81, P<0.01) at end-R. Furthermore, Na+(i) image intensity at end-LF was well correlated with creatine kinase release during R (R=0.79, P<0.05) as well as with infarct size (R=0.77, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that 23Na CSI is a promising tool for the assessment of myocardial viability.
BACKGROUND: Because of rapid changes in myocardial intracellular Na+ (Na+(i)) during ischemia and reperfusion (R), 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appears to be an ideal diagnostic modality for early detection of myocardial ischemia and viability. So far, cardiac 23Na MRI data are limited and mostly concerned with imaging of total Na+. For proper interpretation, imaging of both Na+(i) and extracellular Na+ is essential. In this study, we tested whether Na+(i) imaging can be used to assess viability after low-flow (LF) ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolated rat hearts were subjected to LF (1%, 2%, or 3% of control coronary flow) and R. A shift reagent was used to separate Na+(i) and extracellular Na+ resonances. Acquisition-weighted 23Na chemical shift imaging (CSI) was alternated with 23Na MR spectroscopy. Already during control perfusion, Na+(i) could be clearly seen on the images. Na+(i) image intensity increased with increasing severity of ischemia. During R, Na+(i) image intensity remained highest in 1% LF hearts. Not only did we find very good correlations between Na+(i) image intensity at end-R and end-diastolic pressure (R=0.85, P<0.001) and recovery of the rate-pressure product (R=-0.88, P<0.001) at end-R, but most interestingly, also Na+(i) image intensity at end-LF was well correlated with end-diastolic pressure (R=0.78, P<0.01) and with recovery of the rate-pressure product (R=-0.81, P<0.01) at end-R. Furthermore, Na+(i) image intensity at end-LF was well correlated with creatine kinase release during R (R=0.79, P<0.05) as well as with infarct size (R=0.77, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that 23Na CSI is a promising tool for the assessment of myocardial viability.
Authors: E A Mellon; D T Pilkinton; C M Clark; M A Elliott; W R Witschey; A Borthakur; R Reddy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Friedrich Wetterling; Lindsay Gallagher; Jim Mullin; William M Holmes; Chris McCabe; I Mhairi Macrae; Andrew J Fagan Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Cynthia Philip; Rebecca Seifried; P Gabriel Peterson; Robert Liotta; Kevin Steel; Marcio S Bittencourt; Edward A Hulten Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Eissa N E Aguor; Cees W A van de Kolk; Fatih Arslan; Marcel G J Nederhoff; Pieter A F M Doevendans; Gerard Pasterkamp; Gustav J Strijkers; Cees J A van Echteld Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 2.357