Literature DB >> 15556955

United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of adding exercise classes, spinal manipulation delivered in NHS or private premises, or manipulation followed by exercise to "best care" in general practice for patients consulting with back pain. [See figure].
DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised trial with factorial design.
SETTING: 181 general practices in Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework; 63 community settings around 14 centres across the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 1334 patients consulting their general practices about low back pain. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on the Roland Morris disability questionnaire at three and 12 months, adjusted for centre and baseline scores.
RESULTS: All groups improved over time. Exercise improved mean disability questionnaire scores at three months by 1.4 (95% confidence interval 0.6 to 2.1) more than "best care." For manipulation the additional improvement was 1.6 (0.8 to 2.3) at three months and 1.0 (0.2 to 1.8) at 12 months. For manipulation followed by exercise the additional improvement was 1.9 (1.2 to 2.6) at three months and 1.3 (0.5 to 2.1) at 12 months. No significant differences in outcome occurred between manipulation in NHS premises and in private premises. No serious adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Relative to "best care" in general practice, manipulation followed by exercise achieved a moderate benefit at three months and a small benefit at 12 months; spinal manipulation achieved a small to moderate benefit at three months and a small benefit at 12 months; and exercise achieved a small benefit at three months but not 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15556955      PMCID: PMC535454          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38282.669225.AE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  21 in total

1.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Exercise therapy for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group.

Authors:  M van Tulder; A Malmivaara; R Esmail; B Koes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: a treatment package agreed to by the UK chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associations.

Authors:  E Harvey; A K Burton; J K Moffett; A Breen
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2003-02

Review 4.  Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures.

Authors:  C Bombardier; J Hayden; D E Beaton
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences.

Authors:  J K Moffett; D Torgerson; S Bell-Syer; D Jackson; H Llewlyn-Phillips; A Farrin; J Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

7.  Do attitudes and beliefs influence work loss due to low back trouble?

Authors:  T L Symonds; A K Burton; K M Tillotson; C J Main
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.611

8.  United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-19

9.  Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; R Ostelo; A Kim Burton; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The acceptability to primary care staff of a multidisciplinary training package on acute back pain guidelines.

Authors:  Martin Underwood; Susan O'Meara; Emma Harvey
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  98 in total

1.  Prospective Comparison of Changes in Lumbar Spine MRI Findings over Time between Individuals with Acute Low Back Pain and Controls: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  J Panagopoulos; J S Magnussen; J Hush; C G Maher; M Crites-Battie; J G Jarvik; T S Jensen; M J Hancock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Fatemeh Yazdi; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Anita Gross; Maurits Van Tulder; Lina Santaguida; Joel Gagnier; Carlo Ammendolia; Trish Dryden; Steve Doucette; Becky Skidmore; Raymond Daniel; Thomas Ostermann; Sophia Tsouros
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Clinicians' perceptions of reporting methods for back pain trials: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Martin Underwood; Dawn Carnes; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Physiotherapy for neck and back pain.

Authors:  Nicholas Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-08

5.  United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) trial: is manipulation the most cost effective addition to "best care"?

Authors:  Torill H Tveito; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-19

6.  United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) trial: touch may have had non-specific effect, among other things.

Authors:  Edzard Ernst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-19

7.  United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) trial: what happened to participants who were not included in analysis?

Authors:  Richard Tillett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-19

8.  Acupressure for low back pain.

Authors:  Helen Frost; Sarah Stewart-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

9.  The cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee.

Authors:  Veerle M H Coupé; Cindy Veenhof; Maurits W van Tulder; Joost Dekker; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Cornelia H M Van den Ende
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Flawed trials, flawed analysis: why CBP should avoid rating itself.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Stephen M Perle; Brian J Gleberzon; David H Peterson
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.