BACKGROUND AND AIM: Little is known about the perspectives that patients with advanced cancer and their family members have concerning nutritional problems and nutritional support. The aim of this study was to investigate their experiences of the nutritional situation prior to introduction of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in order to understand factors contributing to the decision to accept HPN. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 patients with advanced cancer who had received HPN and 11 family members. The constant comparative method was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Patients and family members described the nutritional situation prior to HPN as a source of worry and often desperation. Patients reported wanting and trying to eat, but being unable to do so. Family members experienced powerlessness and frustration, as they could not enable the patient to eat. A lack of attention to nutritional problems by the hospital staff was described. The offer of HPN came when patients and family no longer felt able to solve the nutritional problems within the family. CONCLUSION: The desperate and chaotic nutritional situation in the family led to willingness to accept HPN. Because of the severity of the problems, HPN was viewed as a positive alternative.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Little is known about the perspectives that patients with advanced cancer and their family members have concerning nutritional problems and nutritional support. The aim of this study was to investigate their experiences of the nutritional situation prior to introduction of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in order to understand factors contributing to the decision to accept HPN. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 patients with advanced cancer who had received HPN and 11 family members. The constant comparative method was used for data analysis. RESULTS:Patients and family members described the nutritional situation prior to HPN as a source of worry and often desperation. Patients reported wanting and trying to eat, but being unable to do so. Family members experienced powerlessness and frustration, as they could not enable the patient to eat. A lack of attention to nutritional problems by the hospital staff was described. The offer of HPN came when patients and family no longer felt able to solve the nutritional problems within the family. CONCLUSION: The desperate and chaotic nutritional situation in the family led to willingness to accept HPN. Because of the severity of the problems, HPN was viewed as a positive alternative.
Authors: Mi Hyang Um; Mi Youn Choi; Song Mi Lee; Ik Jae Lee; Chang Geol Lee; Yoo Kyoung Park Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-06-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sally Wheelwright; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Jane B Hopkinson; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Alice White; Colin D Johnson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nora Lize; Vera IJmker-Hemink; Rianne van Lieshout; Yvonne Wijnholds-Roeters; Manon van den Berg; Maggy Youssef-El Soud; Sandra Beijer; Natasja Raijmakers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.603