BACKGROUND: There has been declining interest in surgery among medical students and one reason might be the third-year clerkship experience. The aim of this study was to clarify the perceptions and expectations of attendings, residents, and medical students on the clerkship experience. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was distributed to all general surgery attendings, the entire general surgery house staff, and an entire third year medical school class inclusive of the 2001-2002 academic year at a single institution. Statistic analysis consisted of chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis-ANOVA on ranks with Dunn's test for multiple comparisons. A p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 59 attending surgeons (50%), 38 surgical residents (32%), and 107 medical students (66%). Of this student cohort, 35% were planning to choose a surgical specialty as a career. Agreement was high among faculty, students, and residents about factors considered important in evaluation, expectations of skills, and level of skills needed before the clerkship. Medical students desired more hours of instruction, believed they performed fewer procedures per week, and thought that feedback was poor compared with the opinions of faculty and residents (p < 0.002). Nearly 50% of medical students believed they were an inconvenience to the service; 30% of house officers and 27% of faculty (p < 0.001) believed this also. Almost all faculty and residents, however, wanted medical students on the service (> 95%). Faculty believed residents did a better job teaching than either the students or residents themselves did (p < 0.001), and students thought that residents were the primary source of education in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable differences exist between faculty, surgical resident, and medical student perceptions and expectations of medical student education. Structured direct faculty contact, definition of medical student roles on the surgical team, and more consistent feedback can be rapidly improved.
BACKGROUND: There has been declining interest in surgery among medical students and one reason might be the third-year clerkship experience. The aim of this study was to clarify the perceptions and expectations of attendings, residents, and medical students on the clerkship experience. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was distributed to all general surgery attendings, the entire general surgery house staff, and an entire third year medical school class inclusive of the 2001-2002 academic year at a single institution. Statistic analysis consisted of chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis-ANOVA on ranks with Dunn's test for multiple comparisons. A p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 59 attending surgeons (50%), 38 surgical residents (32%), and 107 medical students (66%). Of this student cohort, 35% were planning to choose a surgical specialty as a career. Agreement was high among faculty, students, and residents about factors considered important in evaluation, expectations of skills, and level of skills needed before the clerkship. Medical students desired more hours of instruction, believed they performed fewer procedures per week, and thought that feedback was poor compared with the opinions of faculty and residents (p < 0.002). Nearly 50% of medical students believed they were an inconvenience to the service; 30% of house officers and 27% of faculty (p < 0.001) believed this also. Almost all faculty and residents, however, wanted medical students on the service (> 95%). Faculty believed residents did a better job teaching than either the students or residents themselves did (p < 0.001), and students thought that residents were the primary source of education in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable differences exist between faculty, surgical resident, and medical student perceptions and expectations of medical student education. Structured direct faculty contact, definition of medical student roles on the surgical team, and more consistent feedback can be rapidly improved.
Authors: Richard E Sharpe; David Surrey; Richard J T Gorniak; Levon Nazarian; Vijay M Rao; Adam E Flanders Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Seamus McHugh; Mark Corrigan; Athar Sheikh; Elaine Lehane; William Tanner; Arnold Hill Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: E Boyle; D Healy; A D K Hill; P R O'Connell; M Kerin; S McHugh; P Coyle; J Kelly; S R Walsh; J C Coffey Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Andrew G Hill; Sanket Srinivasa; Susan J Hawken; Mark Barrow; Susan E Farrell; John Hattie; Tzu-Chieh Yu Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2012-03