Literature DB >> 15555754

The laboratory is a key partner in assuring patient safety.

Ana K Stankovic1.   

Abstract

Medical errors have a great impact on patient outcomes. They can cause serious injury to patients or even result in their deaths. However, morbidity and mortality can sometimes be prevented by the timely and effective action of health care workers. Several IOM Reports have focused on the problem of errors in the United States health care system and identified gaps that need to be addressed. As part of the overall health care system, clinical laboratories are vulnerable to medical errors. Because of significant efforts on the part of both the laboratories and the manufacturers of laboratory equipment and reagents, the errors in the analytic phase of the total testing process now represent the smallest portion of testing errors. Currently, laboratory testing errors occur most frequently in the preanalytic phase. The primary reason for the high prevalence of preanalytic errors is that, at the present time, it is difficult to monitor all preanalytic variables and to implement necessary improvement processes, particularly when some of the variables (like phlebotomy) are not under the control of the laboratory. Considerable efforts have been made by laboratory professionals and other stakeholders to decrease testing errors. Minimal quality requirements have been set through regulations for both laboratory testing and the manufacture of medical equipment and reagents. At the same time, nonregulatory approaches have greatly affected the quality of laboratory testing. These include laboratory standards, various quality improvement programs, voluntary reporting of adverse events, and, in the near future, the National Report on the Quality of Laboratory Services. The introduction of successful approaches from other industries, such as Six Sigma and Lean, also will help reduce the rate of laboratory errors. The clinical laboratory has done more than most other sectors of health care to decrease the occurrence of medical errors, making it a key partner inpatient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15555754     DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab Med        ISSN: 0272-2712            Impact factor:   1.935


  8 in total

1.  Knowledge and perceptions of quality systems among Vermont laboratorians.

Authors:  Steven R Blumen; Phda Shelly Naud; Mary Val Palumbo; Barbara McIntosh; Burton W Wilcke
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  Laboratory results that should be ignored.

Authors:  Dirk M Elston
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-10-11

3.  The cost-benefit ratio of screening pregnant women for thrombophilia.

Authors:  Gian Luca Salvagno; Giuseppe Lippi; Massimo Franchini; Giovanni Targher; Martina Montagnana; Massimo Franchi; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Impact of proficiency testing program for laboratories conducting early diagnosis of HIV-1 infection in infants in low- to middle-income countries.

Authors:  Albert Garcia; Shambavi Subbarao; Guoqing Zhang; Linda Parsons; John Nkengasong; Chin-Yih Ou; Dennis Ellenberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Compliance with the clinical laboratory quality protocol in public primary healthcare centres.

Authors:  Adolfo Romero-Arana; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Javier Fagundo-Rivera; Óscar Cruz-Salgado; Mónica Ortega-Moreno; Macarena Romero-Martín; Adolfo Romero
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Analysis of factors influencing the generation of unqualified clinical samples and measures to prevent this generation.

Authors:  Xiaofei Lai; Ping Yang; Yuhong Zhang; Ju Cao; Liping Zhang
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  The effect of storage temperature and time on the concentrations of bovine serum amyloid a and its mammary associated isoform.

Authors:  Csilla Tóthová; Oskar Nagy; Herbert Seidel; Gabriel Kováč
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2012-03-19

Review 8.  Guidelines for overcoming hospital managerial challenges: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Maria Crema; Chiara Verbano
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.423

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.