Eunice Y Kim1, David J Miklowitz. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Campus Box 345, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, USA. kimey@psych.colorado.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Levels of expressed emotion (EE) in relatives are consistent predictors of relapse among bipolar and other mood disordered patients followed naturalistically. However, few studies have examined whether levels of EE predict the course of illness for patients engaged in psychosocial interventions. METHODS: This study examined whether EE levels among caregivers moderated the success of family-based psychosocial interventions for patients with bipolar disorder. EE was examined as a predictor of symptomatic outcome in two groups: (1) bipolar patients receiving family-focused psychoeducational treatment (FFT) or integrated family and individual treatment (IFIT), and (2) bipolar patients receiving crisis management (CM), a less intensive intervention designed to emulate community care. Bipolar patients (N = 125) began the study in an acute illness episode, were stabilized on standard pharmacotherapy regimens, and followed for up to 2 years. RESULTS: Family EE status was not associated with time to relapse in either group. However, patients with high EE relatives reported higher levels of depression over the 2-year term of follow-up, regardless of treatment condition. An examination of the dimensions of EE (critical comments and emotional overinvolvement) indicated that a higher frequency of critical comments predicted higher levels of mania and depression at follow-up. Additionally, the association between EE criticism and levels of mania symptoms was stronger among patients in CM than among patients in family treatment. LIMITATIONS: The participants were recruited from two separate treatment protocols. Patients in the IFIT protocol were not randomly assigned to treatments. CONCLUSIONS: EE is a predictor of symptom severity among bipolar patients undergoing pharmacological and psychosocial treatments, but family intervention may mitigate this association.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Levels of expressed emotion (EE) in relatives are consistent predictors of relapse among bipolar and other mood disorderedpatients followed naturalistically. However, few studies have examined whether levels of EE predict the course of illness for patients engaged in psychosocial interventions. METHODS: This study examined whether EE levels among caregivers moderated the success of family-based psychosocial interventions for patients with bipolar disorder. EE was examined as a predictor of symptomatic outcome in two groups: (1) bipolarpatients receiving family-focused psychoeducational treatment (FFT) or integrated family and individual treatment (IFIT), and (2) bipolarpatients receiving crisis management (CM), a less intensive intervention designed to emulate community care. Bipolarpatients (N = 125) began the study in an acute illness episode, were stabilized on standard pharmacotherapy regimens, and followed for up to 2 years. RESULTS: Family EE status was not associated with time to relapse in either group. However, patients with high EE relatives reported higher levels of depression over the 2-year term of follow-up, regardless of treatment condition. An examination of the dimensions of EE (critical comments and emotional overinvolvement) indicated that a higher frequency of critical comments predicted higher levels of mania and depression at follow-up. Additionally, the association between EE criticism and levels of mania symptoms was stronger among patients in CM than among patients in family treatment. LIMITATIONS: The participants were recruited from two separate treatment protocols. Patients in the IFIT protocol were not randomly assigned to treatments. CONCLUSIONS: EE is a predictor of symptom severity among bipolarpatients undergoing pharmacological and psychosocial treatments, but family intervention may mitigate this association.
Authors: Heather A MacPherson; Amanda L Ruggieri; Rachel E Christensen; Elana Schettini; Kerri L Kim; Sarah A Thomas; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Fiona Lobban; Nadia Akers; Duncan Appelbe; Rossella Iraci Capuccinello; Lesley Chapman; Lizzi Collinge; Susanna Dodd; Sue Flowers; Bruce Hollingsworth; Mahsa Honary; Sonia Johnson; Steven H Jones; Ceu Mateus; Barbara Mezes; Elizabeth Murray; Katerina Panagaki; Naomi Rainford; Heather Robinson; Anna Rosala-Hallas; William Sellwood; Andrew Walker; Paula R Williamson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Alissa J Ellis; Larissa C Portnoff; David A Axelson; Robert A Kowatch; Patricia Walshaw; David J Miklowitz Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: David J Miklowitz; Elizabeth L George; David A Axelson; Eunice Y Kim; Boris Birmaher; Christopher Schneck; Carol Beresford; W Edward Craighead; David A Brent Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.839