| Literature DB >> 15555072 |
Temitope Ayodeji Esan1, Adeyemi Oluniyi Olusile, Patricia Adetokunbo Akeredolu, Ayodeji Omobolanle Esan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rate of total edentulism is said to be increasing in developing countries and this had been attributed mainly to the high prevalence of periodontal diseases and caries. Several reports have shown that non-disease factors such as attitude, behavior, dental attendance, characteristics of health care systems and socio-demographic factors play important roles in the aetiopathogenesis of edentulism. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between socio-demographic factors and edentulism.Entities:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15555072 PMCID: PMC538266 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-4-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Distribution by gender.
| Gender | Ile-Ife | Lagos | Total | |||
| No | % | No | % | No | % | |
| Male | 48 | 48.0 | 32 | 61.5 | 80 | 52.6 |
| Female | 52 | 52.0 | 20 | 38.5 | 72 | 47.4 |
| Total | 100 | 100.0 | 52 | 100.0 | 152 | 100.0 |
χ2 = 2.515, df = 1, P = 0.113.
Denture demand by age and center/clinic
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| ≤20 | 18 | 18.0 | 5 | 9.6 | 23 | 15.13 |
| 21–40 | 35 | 35.0 | 22 | 42.3 | 57 | 37.5 |
| 41–60 | 25 | 25.0 | 17 | 32.7 | 42 | 27.63 |
| ≥61 | 22 | 22.0 | 8 | 15.4 | 30 | 19.74 |
χ2 = 3.568, df = 3, P = 0.312
Figure 1Distribution of patients according to educational level.
Figure 2Socio-economic status distribution.
Demand for various types of denture by study location.
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Complete | 11 | 11.0 | 2 | 3.8 | 13 | 8.6 |
| Lower or upper complete denture | 3 | 3.0 | 2 | 3.8 | 5 | 3.3 |
| Removable partial denture | 86 | 86.0 | 48 | 92.3 | 134 | 88.2 |
χ2 = 3.568, df = 3, P = 0.312
For the purpose of analysis, complete and lower/upper complete denture columns were merged.
Types of denture demand within each age group.
| ≤20 | 1 | 4.3 | 22 | 95.7 | 23 |
| 21–40 | 2 | 3.5 | 55 | 96.5 | 57 |
| 41–60 | 5 | 11.9 | 37 | 88.1 | 42 |
| ≥61 | 10 | 33.3 | 20 | 66.7 | 30 |
Likelihood-ratio χ2 = 16.579, df = 3, P = 0.001
Demand for various prostheses in relation to gender.
| Complete denture | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| Complete upper or Lower denture | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Partial denture | 71 | 63 | 134 |
χ2 = 0.57, df = 1, p = 0.812
For the purpose of analysis, complete and lower/upper complete denture columns were merged.
Figure 3Types of prostheses demanded by centers
Demand for dentures according to educational level
| 11 | 61.1 | 12 | 8.9 | 23 | 15.1 | |
| 3 | 16.7 | 8 | 5.9 | 11 | 7.2 | |
| 0 | 0.0 | 51 | 38.1 | 51 | 33.6 | |
| 4 | 22.2 | 63 | 47.0 | 67 | 44.1 | |
Fishers exact test P < 0.001
For the purpose of analysis, secondary and tertiary educational levels' rows were merged. Also complete denture and either upper or lower complete denture column were merged
Relationship between age group, educational level and completely edentulous state
| ≤20 | 1(9.1%) | - | - |
| 21–40 | 2(18.2%) | - | - |
| 41–60 | 4(33.4%) | 1(33.3%) | |
| >60 | 4(33.4%) | 2(66.7%) | 4(100%) |
Likelihood-ratio χ2 = 7.515, df = 6 P = 0.276
Relationship between edentulous state and socio-economic status.
| Socio-economic status | Edentulous state | Total | ||||
| Partial | complete | |||||
| No | % | No | % | No | % | |
| Class I | 27 | 96.4 | 1 | 3.6 | 28 | 18.4 |
| Class II | 33 | 76.7 | 10 | 23.3 | 43 | 28.3 |
| Class III | 74 | 91.4 | 7 | 8.6 | 81 | 53.3 |
| Total | 134 | 88.2 | 18 | 11.8 | 152 | 100 |
χ2 = 7.992, df = 2, P = 0.018
Socio-economic status distribution by centers
| Class I | 8 | 15.4 | 20 | 20.0 | 28 | 18.4 |
| Class II | 21 | 40.4 | 22 | 22.0 | 43 | 28.3 |
| Class III | 23 | 44.2 | 58 | 58.0 | 81 | 53.3 |
| 52 | 100.0 | 100 | 100.0 | 152 | 100.0 | |
χ2 = 5.70, df = 2, p = 0.057