Literature DB >> 15553427

Blood loss at delivery: how accurate is your estimation?

Pauline Glover1.   

Abstract

This paper will examine the literature on blood loss at delivery and report the findings of a small pilot study where midwives and doctors were asked to estimate blood loss at simulated stations. The results were analysed using simple frequency distribution. This simple study demonstrated that midwives and other health professionals underestimate blood loss at delivery by 30-50%. The implication for midwives is that there is a need to double their estimated blood loss at delivery when it is over 500 ml.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15553427     DOI: 10.1016/s1031-170x(03)80005-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Midwifery        ISSN: 1445-4386


  19 in total

1.  Postpartum blood loss: visual estimation versus objective quantification with a novel birthing drape.

Authors:  Tripop Lertbunnaphong; Numporn Lapthanapat; Jarunee Leetheeragul; Pussara Hakularb; Amporn Ownon
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Quantification of Peri-partum Blood Loss: Training Module and Clot Conversion Factor.

Authors:  Suvarna Satish Khadilkar; Akanksha Sood; Prajakta Ahire
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-05-24

Review 3.  What measured blood loss tells us about postpartum bleeding: a systematic review.

Authors:  N L Sloan; J Durocher; T Aldrich; J Blum; B Winikoff
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Life Threatening Obstetrical Complications Requiring Multiple Transfusions.

Authors:  Ritu Khatuja; Geetika Jain; Gita Radhakrishnan; A G Radhika; Atul Juneja; Bharat Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

5.  Incidence of immediate postpartum hemorrhages in French maternity units: a prospective observational study (HERA study).

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Chloé Barasinski; Bruno Pereira; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Marian Knight; William M Callaghan; Cynthia Berg; Sophie Alexander; Marie-Helene Bouvier-Colle; Jane B Ford; K S Joseph; Gwyneth Lewis; Robert M Liston; Christine L Roberts; Jeremy Oats; James Walker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Comparing the estimation of postpartum hemorrhage using the weighting method and National Guideline with the postpartum hemorrhage estimation by midwives.

Authors:  Nahid Golmakani; Khosheh Khaleghinezhad; Selmeh Dadgar; Majid Hashempor; Nosrat Baharian
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Is accurate and reliable blood loss estimation the 'crucial step' in early detection of postpartum haemorrhage: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Angela Hancock; Andrew D Weeks; Dame Tina Lavender
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Effect of education and clinical assessment on the accuracy of post partum blood loss estimation.

Authors:  Hanan M Al-Kadri; Hanan Dahlawi; Mona Al Airan; Elham Elsherif; Nasser Tawfeeq; Yane Mokhele; Drika Brown; Hani M Tamim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Reporting errors, incidence and risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage and progression to severe PPH: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  A Briley; P T Seed; G Tydeman; H Ballard; M Waterstone; J Sandall; L Poston; R M Tribe; S Bewley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.