Literature DB >> 15552157

The use of cement in osteoarticular allografts for proximal humeral bone tumors.

Henry DeGroot1, Davide Donati, Michele Di Liddo, Enrico Gozzi, Mario Mercuri.   

Abstract

In a proximal humerus resection for a bone tumor, the use of an osteoarticular allograft is considered the best restoration of shoulder function. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 31 patients who had an intraarticular resection of the proximal humerus for a bone tumor. Twenty-three of the allografts were filled with cement. The average followup was 5.3 years. Of the 31 patients with more than 24 months followup, seven had revision surgery or removal of the allograft. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the probability of survival of the reconstruction was 78% at 5 years. Fracture was the main complication in 11 patients (37%) of whom seven were in the noncemented group. Four of these patients had successful surgery for conversion to an allograft-prosthetic composite, whereas one patient had a new allograft. Allografts that were filled with cement had four fractures (18%); three were subchondral fractures discovered by routine CT scans. None of these patients had pain or needed revision surgery. Osteochondral allograft in proximal humerus replacement is a reliable reconstructive technique if the allograft is augmented by filling the intramedullary space with cement. Moreover, cement augmented allografts are less expensive and technically easier than allograft-prosthetic composites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15552157     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000138959.50057.2c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

Review 1.  Management of infection following reconstruction in bone tumors.

Authors:  Sudhir K Kapoor; Rajesh Thiyam
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-07

2.  CORR Insights(®): What Are the Risk Factors and Management Options for Infection After Reconstruction With Massive Bone Allografts?

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Modular tumor prostheses of the humerus].

Authors:  P T Funovics; M Dominkus
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Proximal humeral osteoarticular allografts: technique, pearls and pitfalls, outcomes.

Authors:  German L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Muscolo; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

5.  Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus after tumour resection with polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Baichuan Wang; Qiang Wu; Jianxiang Liu; Shuhua Yang; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Synthetic mesh improves shoulder function after intraarticular resection and prosthetic replacement of proximal humerus.

Authors:  Xiaodong Tang; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang; Shun Tang; Tao Ji
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Outcome after reconstruction of the proximal humerus for tumor resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Teun Teunis; Sjoerd P F T Nota; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph H Schwab; Santiago A Lozano-Calderón
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Sheila C Adams; J David Pitcher; Theodore I Malinin; H Thomas Temple
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Long-term results for limb salvage with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Christian M Ogilvie; Eileen A Crawford; Harish S Hosalkar; Joseph J King; Richard D Lackman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Osteogenic protein-1 for long bone nonunion: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.