Literature DB >> 15552134

Successful treatment of total hip and knee infection with articulating antibiotic components: a modified treatment method.

Richard P Evans1.   

Abstract

There are many problems associated with the use of articulating antibiotic cement spacer blocks and articulating components in the two-stage treatment of total hip replacement and total knee replacement infections. These include loss of motion during and after treatment, bone loss, generation of cement debris, inadequate dosing of cement with the appropriate antibiotic, and biologic failure. Forty-four patients with 54 consecutive periprosthetic hip and knee infections (31 septic total knee arthroplasties and 23 septic total hip arthroplasties) had treatment with a modified two-stage reimplantation protocol using articulating components made of antibiotic-cement-only prosthetic components and antibiotic-cement-covered prosthetic components between January 1995 and May 2002. Second-stage revision, after six weeks of parenteral antibiotics, was completed an average of 84 days after the first stage. A minimum two-year followup after final treatment is evaluated. One of the 23 total hip replacement infections persisted or recurred with the original organism(s) after treatment (95.7% success) as did two of the 31 total knee replacement infections (93.5% success). Combined success rate was 94.4%. This modified treatment method incorporates early range of motion during first-stage treatment with articulating components that provide local high-dose elution of broad-spectrum antibiotics, provides the flexibility of customizing the antibiotic cement components with culture-directed antibiotics, and results in a high biologic success rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15552134     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000143739.07632.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

Review 1.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Intraoperative molds to create an articulating spacer for the infected knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Keith R Berend; Gregg R Klein; Alexander C Gordon; Adolph V Lombardi; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Federica Rosso; Antongiulio Marmotti; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

5.  A technique for the fabrication of a reinforced moulded articulating cement spacer in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew Kent; Rajesh Rachha; Manoj Sood
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Custom fitted articulating cement spacers for use in two-stage revision knee replacement.

Authors:  P O Coe; N P M Jain; D S Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Ryan S Charette; Christopher M Melnic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

8.  Sufficient release of antibiotic by a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Sebastian Vogt; Martin Reinsch; Hubert Büchner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Siraj A Sayeed; Qais Naziri; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.