Literature DB >> 15551581

Determination of the relative linear collision stopping power and linear scattering power of electron bolus material.

D A Low1, K R Hogstrom.   

Abstract

The linear collision stopping power and linear scattering power for machineable wax relative to water have been determined for electron energies between 2 and 20 MeV. Knowledge of these quantities is necessary for the use of this wax as bolus in electron pencil-beam dose algorithms. The atomic composition of the wax (rho = 0.920 +/- 0.001 g cm(-3)) was obtained by having the wax assayed. The formalisms expressed in the ICRU Report 35 were used to calculate the relative linear collision stopping and linear scattering powers of the wax. The calculated relative linear collision stopping powers of 2 to 20 MeV electrons in the wax ranged from 0.949 +/- 0.005 to 0.952 +/- 0.005, and the calculated relative linear scattering powers ranged from 0.734 +/- 0.004 to 0.729 +/- 0.004. As a check of the calculation method, the relative linear collision stopping power was measured by determining the shift in electron central-axis depth-ionization curves when varying thicknesses of water were replaced by wax. These measurements, made using 10, 12, 15 and 18 MeV electron beams with wax thicknesses from 1.0 - 4.0 cm, resulted in a mean value of 0.931 +/- 0.008. Determination of the relative linear stopping power and the linear scattering power by using the measured CT number to extract values from patient data tables resulted in values of 0.933 +/- 0.009 and 0.746 +/- 0.016, respectively, indicating that it should be acceptable to use the Hounsfield values obtained with CT scans for treatment planning dose calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 15551581     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/6/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Use of an electron spoiler for radiation treatment of surface skin diseases.

Authors:  Víctor Hernández; Alberto Sánchez-Reyes; Andreu Badal; Antoni Vila; Encarna Mur; Agustí Pedro; Francisco Sanchiz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Application of frozen Thiel-embalmed specimens for radiotherapy delineation guideline development: a method to create accurate MRI-enhanced CT datasets.

Authors:  Michael E J Stouthandel; Pim Pullens; Stephanie Bogaert; Max Schoepen; Carl Vangestel; Eric Achten; Liv Veldeman; Tom Van Hoof
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Evaluation of a mixed beam therapy for postmastectomy breast cancer patients: Bolus electron conformal therapy combined with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; David Heins; Mary Sanders; Beibei Guo; Kenneth Hogstrom
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Image-guided bolus electron conformal therapy - a case study.

Authors:  Omar A Zeidan; Bhavin D Chauhan; William W Estabrook; Twyla R Willoughby; Rafael R Manon; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system.

Authors:  C T Baird; G Starkschall; H H Liu; T A Buchholz; K R Hogstrom
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Utilization of custom electron bolus in head and neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  R J Kudchadker; J A Antolak; W H Morrison; P F Wong; K R Hogstrom
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Design and production of 3D printed bolus for electron radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shiqin Su; Kathryn Moran; James L Robar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.