Literature DB >> 1555095

Appraisal of percutaneous tracheostomy.

D J Leinhardt1, M Mughal, B Bowles, R Glew, R Kishen, J MacBeath, M Irving.   

Abstract

Two commercially available kits have been used to create 25 percutaneous tracheostomies, 20 using the Cook system and five using the Rapitrac system. The operation time and complication rates of these tracheostomies have been compared with those for 16 conventional tracheostomies performed for similar indications. Median operating times were 60 (range 30-105) min for conventional tracheostomy, 15 (range 8-70) min for Cook and 5 (range 3-15) min for Rapitrac systems (P less than 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the Rapitrac group had complications compared with the other two groups (P less than 0.05). The complication rate for the Cook group compared favourably with that for the conventional tracheostomy group. The Cook system of percutaneous tracheostomy is a simple, rapid and safe alternative to conventional tracheostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1555095     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800790324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a double-blind randomized trial.

Authors:  C Gysin; P Dulguerov; J P Guyot; T V Perneger; B Abajo; J C Chevrolet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A single-center 8-year experience with percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.

Authors:  P A Kearney; M M Griffen; J B Ochoa; B R Boulanger; B J Tseui; R M Mentzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

4.  Tracheal stenosis aftertracheostomy or intubation: review with special regard to cause and management.

Authors:  Alpay Sarper; Arife Ayten; Irfan Eser; Omer Ozbudak; Abid Demircan
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

5.  Further refinement of percutaneous tracheostomy technique.

Authors:  P B Hazard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with endoscopic guidance: experience with 71 ICU patients.

Authors:  W B Winkler; R Karnik; O Seelmann; J Havlicek; J Slany
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Comparative study of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A Ravi Kumar; Sanjeev Mohanty; K Senthil; M Gopinath
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07

Review 8.  Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Rosa Klotz; Pascal Probst; Marlene Deininger; Ulla Klaiber; Kathrin Grummich; Markus K Diener; Markus A Weigand; Markus W Büchler; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Percutaneous dilatational versus conventional surgical tracheostomy in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Tarek F Youssef; Mohamed Rifaat Ahmed; Aly Saber
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-11

10.  Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Rosa Klotz; Ulla Klaiber; Kathrin Grummich; Pascal Probst; Markus K Diener; Markus W Büchler; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.