Literature DB >> 15550577

Clinical trial design for microarray predictive marker discovery and assessment.

L Pusztai1, K R Hess.   

Abstract

Transcriptional profiling technologies that simultaneously measure the expression of thousands of mRNA species represent a powerful new clinical research tool. Similar to previous laboratory analytical methods including immunohistochemistry, PCR and in situ hybridization, this new technology may also find its niche in routine diagnostics. Outcome predictors discovered by these methods may be quite different from previous single-gene markers. These novel tests will probably combine the information embedded in the expression of multiple genes with mathematical prediction algorithms to formulate classification rules and predict outcome. The performance of machine learning-algorithm-based diagnostic tests may improve as they are trained on larger and larger sets of samples, and several generations of tests with improving accuracy may be introduced sequentially. Several gene-expression profiling-technology platforms are mature enough for clinical testing. The most important next step that is needed for further progress is the development and validation of multigene predictors in prospectively designed clinical trials to determine the true accuracy and clinical value of this new technology. This manuscript reviews methodological and statistical issues relevant to clinical trial design to discover and validate multigene predictors of response to therapy.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15550577     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  21 in total

1.  Development and Validation of Biomarker Classifiers for Treatment Selection.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  Accomplishments in 2007 in biologic markers for gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Heinz-Josef Lenz; Patrick Johnston
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05

3.  Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Prognostic testing in uveal melanoma by transcriptomic profiling of fine needle biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Michael D Onken; Lori A Worley; Rosa M Dávila; Devron H Char; J William Harbour
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  PPARγ targeted oral cancer treatment and additional utility of genomics analytic techniques.

Authors:  Nathan Handley; Jacob Eide; Randall Taylor; Beverly Wuertz; Patrick Gaffney; Frank Ondrey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Detection of differentially expressed glycogenes in trabecular meshwork of eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Shiri Diskin; Janardan Kumar; Zhiyi Cao; Joel S Schuman; Tim Gilmartin; Steven R Head; Noorjahan Panjwani
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Designing a study to evaluate the benefit of a biomarker for selecting patient treatment.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Marshall D Brown; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Genomic markers for decision making: what is preventing us from using markers?

Authors:  Vicky M Coyle; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Analysis of DNA microarray expression data.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  A simulation-approximation approach to sample size planning for high-dimensional classification studies.

Authors:  Perry de Valpine; Hans-Marcus Bitter; Michael P S Brown; Jonathan Heller
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 5.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.