Literature DB >> 15549627

A 6-year experience with the Swedish adjustable gastric band Prospective long-term audit of laparoscopic gastric banding.

J Zehetner1, F Holzinger, H Triaca, Ch Klaiber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In morbid obesity conservative therapy often fails to reduce overweight permanently. As a consequence, several bariatric surgical procedures have been developed to achieve permanent excess weight loss. Among these, the laparoscopic restrictive procedures seem to be the least invasive. The aim of this prospective study was to assess and analyze the effects, complications, and outcomes after the implantation of the Swedish adjustable gastric band (SAGB) in long-term follow-up.
METHODS: All consecutive patients with implantation of a SAGB between August 1996 and August 2002 were prospectively investigated. The placement of the SAGB was done by laparoscopy in all cases. Success was rated by the reduction of body mass index (BMI) excess weight loss (EWL), and reduction of comorbidities. "Nonresponders" to SAGB were defined as <30% EWL after a 3-year follow-up. Band-related complications were recorded and classified. Patient's outcome was assessed after 6 months and subsequently each year postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total of 190 patients received a SAGB, 97% of whom could be followed up with a mean follow-up period of 39.4 months (duration of follow-up, 6-72). During follow-up, a significant reduction or improvement of BMI, EWL, and comorbidities were found. Nineteen percent of patients were identified as nonresponders. Early intraoperative and postoperative complications related to SAGB were one perforation of the gastric fundus (0.5%), one conversion (0.5%), one bleeding (0.5%), and two band infections (1.1%). The SAGB-related complications encountered during long-term follow-up were three port problems (1.6%), four band migrations (2.1%), five slipping/pouch dilatations (2.6%), and two band leakages (1.1%). All intra- and postoperative SAGB-related complications accounted for a total morbidity of 10.5%. Operative mortality was 0%. The overall reoperation rate was 8.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: In long-term follow-up, SAGB is safe and effective. Our results demonstrate a significant EWL of 50% during the first 24 months. However, patient selection has to be improved to reduce the nonresponder rate. SAGB leads to a significant reduction of obesity-related comorbidities. SAGB is an attractive alternative in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549627     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

1.  Spontaneous volume changes in gastric banding devices: complications of a semipermeable membrane.

Authors:  W Wiesner; M Hauser; O Schöb; M Weber; R Hauser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity.

Authors:  James D Evans; Michael H Scott; Annemarie S Brown; John Rogers
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Surgical treatment of severe obesity with a low-pressure adjustable gastric band: experimental data and clinical results in 625 patients.

Authors:  Wim Ceelen; Jean Walder; Anne Cardon; Katrien Van Renterghem; Uwe Hesse; Mohamed El Malt; Piet Pattyn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Excessive mortality and causes of death in morbidly obese men.

Authors:  E J Drenick; G S Bale; F Seltzer; D G Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Intermediate results following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Mikael Victorzon; Pekka Tolonen
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

6.  Treatment of morbid obesity with the Swedish adjustable gastric band (SAGB): complication rate during a 12-month follow-up period.

Authors:  P Hauri; R Steffen; T Ricklin; H J Riedtmann; P Sendi; F F Horber
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Laparoscopic gastric banding: a minimally invasive surgical treatment for morbid obesity: prospective study of 500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Franck Zinzindohoue; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Richard Douard; Nejib Elian; Jean-Marc Ferraz; Jean-Philippe Blanche; Jean-Louis Berta; Jean-Jacques Altman; Denis Safran; Paul-Henri Cugnenc
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding at a U.S. center with up to 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Richard B Rubenstein
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  US experience with the LAP-BAND system.

Authors:  Christine J Ren; Santiago Horgan; Jaime Ponce
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 10.  Changes in comorbidities and improvements in quality of life after LAP-BAND placement.

Authors:  John B Dixon; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): surgical results and 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Camilo Boza; Cristian Gamboa; Gustavo Perez; Fernando Crovari; Alex Escalona; Fernando Pimentel; Alejandro Raddatz; Sergio Guzman; Luis Ibáñez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The reporting of gastric band slip and related complications; a review of the literature.

Authors:  Richard John Egan; Simon J W Monkhouse; Hayley E Meredith; Sharon E Bates; Justin D T Morgan; Sally A Norton
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Bariatric surgery and bariatric psychology: evolution of the Dutch approach.

Authors:  Gerbrand C M van Hout; Charlotte M J M Vreeswijk; Guus L van Heck
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Endoscopic management of penetrated adjustable gastric band with its connecting tube: report of a case.

Authors:  Halil Coskun; Suleyman Bozkurt; Tuba Atak; Huseyin Kadioglu
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.942

5.  The bariatric surgery and weight losing: a meta-analysis in the long- and very long-term effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss in adults.

Authors:  Mahdieh Golzarand; Karamollah Toolabi; Roya Farid
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Graft survival and complications after laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity--lessons learned from a 12-year experience.

Authors:  Markus Naef; Wolfgang G Mouton; Ursula Naef; Oliver Kummer; Beat Muggli; Hans E Wagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Prospective evaluation and 7-year follow-up of Swedish adjustable gastric banding in adults with extreme obesity.

Authors:  Bruno M Balsiger; Daniel Ernst; Daniel Giachino; Ruedi Bachmann; Andreas Glaettli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Efficacy of a laparoscopic gastric restrictive device in an obese canine model.

Authors:  Xiaomei Guo; Samer G Mattar; Scott E Mimms; Jose A Navia; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Outcome and complications after laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding: 5-year results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Markus Naef; Ursula Naef; Wolfgang G Mouton; Hans E Wagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Experiences of two centers of bariatric surgery in the treatment of intragastrale band migration after gastric banding-the importance of the German multicenter observational study for quality assurance in obesity surgery 2005 and 2006.

Authors:  C Stroh; U Hohmann; U Will; R Flade-Kuthe; B Herbig; S Höhne; H Köhler; P Pick; Th Horbach; R Weiner; S Wolff; H Lippert; A M Wolf; U Schmidt; F Meyer; Th Manger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.