Literature DB >> 15549496

One-year clinical evaluation of a flowable resin liner associated with a microhybrid resin in noncarious cervical lesions.

Alessandro D Loguercio1, Camila Zago, Kiandra Leal, Neila Rosane Ribeiro, Alessandra Reis.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance over 1 year of a microhybrid composite resin for class V restorations both lined and not lined with a flowable composite resin. Nineteen patients having at least two pairs of cervical noncarious lesions under occlusion were enrolled in this study. A total of 38 restorations were placed, half for each group (Single-Bond + Filtek-Flow + Filtek Z250, and Single-Bond + Filtek Z250). Two calibrated operators placed all restorations according to the manufacturers' instructions. Two other independent examiners evaluated the restorations at baseline and after a 12-month period according to the USPHS criteria and modified criteria for color match. The classic alpha score was divided into A1 for "not detectable" and A2 for "slightly discernible" filling. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test and McNemar's test (P=0.05). One restoration was lost after 12 months for each group (retention rate 95% for each group). After 12 months, 18 restorations showed a trend towards dark yellowing (color match A2). The use of Filtek Flow as a liner under Filtek Z250 restorations did not improve the clinical performance of class V restorations after 6 and 12 months of evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549496     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-004-0287-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  13 in total

1.  Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive.

Authors:  E J Swift; J Perdigão; H O Heymann; A D Wilder; S C Bayne; K N May; J R Sturdevant; T M Roberson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": literature review and clinical recommendations.

Authors:  G L Unterbrink; W H Liebenberg
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Martin J Tyas; Michael F Burrow
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers.

Authors:  Roberto R Braga; Thomas J Hilton; Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: one-year evaluation of clinical performance.

Authors:  T O Närhi; J Tanner; I Ostela; K Narva; T Nohrström; T Tirri; P K Vallittu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Alessandro D Loguercio; Alessandra Reis; Alcebíades N Barbosa; Jean François Roulet
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study.

Authors:  H O Heymann; J R Sturdevant; S Bayne; A D Wilder; T B Sluder; W D Brunson
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified. Glass ionomer restorative material.

Authors:  D M Barnes; L W Blank; J C Gingell; P P Gilner
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives.

Authors:  R Labella; P Lambrechts; B Van Meerbeek; G Vanherle
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.

Authors:  Luiz Narciso Baratieri; Simone Canabarro; Guilherme C Lopes; André V Ritter
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

View more
  4 in total

1.  Two-year clinical evaluation of composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Wei Qin; Zhi Song; Yun-Yao Ye; Zheng-Mei Lin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Improving Composite Resin Performance Through Decreasing its Viscosity by Different Methods.

Authors:  Kusai Baroudi; Said Mahmoud
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-06-26

3.  Clinical performance of Class I nanohybrid composite restorations with resin-modified glass-ionomer liner and flowable composite liner: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Krishtipati Suhasini; Koppolu Madhusudhana; Chinni Suneelkumar; Anumula Lavanya; K S Chandrababu; Perisetty Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

4.  The effect of three lining materials on microleakage of packable composite resin restorations in young premolars with cavity margins located on enamel and dentin/cementum - An In vitro study.

Authors:  Hazim Mohamed Rizk; Mohammed Al-Ruthea; Mohammed Ali Habibullah
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.