Literature DB >> 15549353

Optimising MS disease-modifying therapies: antibodies in perspective.

Gavin Giovannoni1.   

Abstract

A proportion of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with interferon (IFN) a develop neutralising anti-IFN beta antibodies (NABs). The immunogenicity of the available commercial compounds relates to the genetic structure of the IFN beta molecule, its mode of production, glycosylation status, aggregate formation, commercial formulation, potency, dose, frequency and, possibly, route of administration. At present, it is not possible to predict who will develop NABs usually appear within the first 2 years of starting therapy. In patients treated with IFN beta in whom NABs persist for a significant period of time, their presence is associated with a reduction in both the biological effects and clinical efficacy. Approximately one third of NAB-positive patients with a titre > 20 NU/mL will revert to NAB-negative status with long-term follow-up. The persistence of NABs appears to be linked to the type of IFN beta treatment as well as the titre of antibodies. The overall efficacy of IFN beta and, hence, of any biological disease-modifying treatment (DMT) would be substantially improved if the development of NABs could be prevented or reversed. Although the overall efficacy of IFN beta in MS is relatively modest, the efficacy in individuals who remain NAB-negative is considerably better than in those who become persistently NAB-positive. One could argue that when comparing the 'true' clinical efficacy of different IFN beta products, the comparisons should be limited to the cohorts that remain NAB-negative. As a corollary, the therapeutic efficacy of IFN beta could be maximised if patients who tolerate higher-dose preparations could be prevented from developing persistent NABs. Strategies employed to prevent or reverse the development of NABs with other biological compounds (e. g. insulin, factor VIII, IFN beta, recombinant human erythropoietin) include improvements in the manufacturing process, immunosuppression, induction of tolerance and deimmunisation, and these should be considered in relation to biological DMT therapy as part of future clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549353     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-004-1505-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  30 in total

Review 1.  Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Monthly corticosteroids decrease neutralizing antibodies to IFNbeta1 b: a randomized trial in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Carlo Pozzilli; Giovanni Antonini; Francesca Bagnato; Caterina Mainero; Valentina Tomassini; Emanuela Onesti; Roberta Fantozzi; Simona Galgani; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Enrico Millefiorini; Maria Spadaro; Frank Dahlke; Claudio Gasperini
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Filip Baert; Maja Noman; Severine Vermeire; Gert Van Assche; Geert D' Haens; An Carbonez; Paul Rutgeerts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Immunogenicity of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients: influence of preparation, dosage, dose frequency, and route of administration. Danish Multiple Sclerosis Study Group.

Authors:  C Ross; K M Clemmesen; M Svenson; P S Sørensen; N Koch-Henriksen; G L Skovgaard; K Bendtzen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Interferon-beta (INF-beta) antibodies in interferon-beta1a- and interferon-beta1b-treated multiple sclerosis patients. Prevalence, kinetics, cross-reactivity, and factors enhancing interferon-beta immunogenicity in vivo.

Authors:  P Perini; A Facchinetti; P Bulian; A R Massaro; D D Pascalis; A Bertolotto; G Biasi; P Gallo
Journal:  Eur Cytokine Netw       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.737

6.  Blocking effects of serum reactive antibodies induced by glatiramer acetate treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hassan H Salama; Jian Hong; Ying C Q Zang; Azza El-Mongui; Jingwu Zhang
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Antibodies to glatiramer acetate do not interfere with its biological functions and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  D Teitelbaum; T Brenner; O Abramsky; R Aharoni; M Sela; R Arnon
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Antibodies against rHuEPO: native and recombinant.

Authors:  Nicole Casadevall
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) as a potential response marker for interferon-beta treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Wandinger; Jan D Lünemann; Oliver Wengert; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Orhan Aktas; Alexandra Weber; Eva Grundström; Stefan Ehrlich; Klaus-D Wernecke; Hans-Dieter Volk; Frauke Zipp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Polyreactive antibodies to glatiramer acetate promote myelin repair in murine model of demyelinating disease.

Authors:  Daren R Ure; Moses Rodriguez
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.