Literature DB >> 15549213

[Electronic surveillance of nosocomial infections in head and neck surgery and stapes surgery].

S Preyer1, A Failenschmid, M Holderried, D Bless.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infection is generally regarded as the most important postoperative complication. Therefore, on 28 December 2002 a German law was implemented requiring the surveillance of postoperative infections in all hospitals.
METHODS: The authors propose using stapes and thyroid surgery to monitor the infection rate in a typical Head and Neck Department. A versatile software (CISS) based on MS Word and MS Excel was developed for this purpose.
RESULTS: Postoperative infections were retrospectively analyzed for three subsequent years. The present data confirm the results of previous studies that surveillance itself is a powerful tool in reducing the postoperative infection rate.
CONCLUSION: The newly developed software provided an easy tool for the collection of infection data. The reported infection rates in stapes and thyroid surgery are representative of ENT clinics in Germany.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15549213     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1172-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  18 in total

1.  [Prevention of postoperative wound infections. Evidence-based recommendations].

Authors:  C Geffers; P Gastmeier; F Daschner; H Rüden
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.942

2.  Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections. A case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs.

Authors:  K B Poulsen; A Bremmelgaard; A I Sørensen; D Raahave; J V Petersen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals.

Authors:  R W Haley; D H Culver; J W White; W M Morgan; T G Emori; V P Munn; T M Hooton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988.

Authors:  J S Garner; W R Jarvis; T G Emori; T C Horan; J M Hughes
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Risk factors for postoperative infection.

Authors:  R A Garibaldi; D Cushing; T Lerer
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Accuracy of reporting nosocomial infections in intensive-care-unit patients to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System: a pilot study.

Authors:  T G Emori; J R Edwards; D H Culver; C Sartor; L A Stroud; E E Gaunt; T C Horan; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Nosocomial wound infections: a prevalence study and analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  N Wischnewski; G Kampf; P Gastmeier; J Schlingmann; M Schumacher; F Daschner; H Ruden
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun

8.  The SENIC Project. Study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control (SENIC Project). Summary of study design.

Authors:  R W Haley; D Quade; H E Freeman; J V Bennett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  National nosocomial infections surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods.

Authors:  T G Emori; D H Culver; T C Horan; W R Jarvis; J W White; D R Olson; S Banerjee; J R Edwards; W J Martone; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.918

10.  Measuring the costs of nosocomial infections: methods for estimating economic burden on the hospital.

Authors:  R W Haley
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Surveillance of postoperative nosocomial infections in ENT medicine].

Authors:  P A Federspil; P Federspil
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.284

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.