Literature DB >> 15548979

Prospective psychosocial monitoring of living kidney donors using the Short Form-36 health survey: results at 12 months.

Graeme C Smith1, Thomas Trauer, Peter G Kerr, Steven J Chadban.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of prospective psychosocial outcome studies on living kidney donors impedes identification of risk factors for poor outcome.
METHODS: Psychiatric assessment of living kidney donors was performed preoperatively and at 4 and 12 months postoperatively using a semistructured interview, the Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey, and Patient Health Questionnaire psychiatric assessment. A total of 48 of 51 consecutive donors (94%) over a 5-year period were available for follow-up and completed all assessments.
RESULTS: At preoperative assessment, only 1 of the 48 donors (2%) had a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition Axis I psychiatric disorder, but 15 (31%) developed a disorder during the 12 months, a 29% incidence. Disorders were depressive (12%), anxiety (6%), and adjustment (13%). Seven donors (15%) demonstrated a disorder at 12 months (depressive 10%, anxiety 2%, adjustment 2%). There was a corresponding decline in psychosocial function as measured by the SF-36 Mental Component Summary score; it decreased at both 4 and 12 months (P<0.01, P<0.05); for 19% of donors, this was a larger decrease than would be expected for the cohort (>2 standard error of measurement units). Scores for SF-36 scales of General Health and Vitality decreased significantly (P<0.05), as did those of Bodily Pain, indicating greater impairment from pain. Psychiatric disorder at 12 months was associated with donor psychosocial function (Mental Component Summary) and psychiatric disorder at 4 months (P<0.01), physical function (SF-36 Physical Component Summary score) at 4 and 12 months (P<0.01), and recipient psychiatric disorder at 12 months (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Donors should be alerted to possible psychosocial impairment, assessed for risk factors, and monitored for at least 12 months. Treatment should be available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15548979     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000140967.34029.f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  15 in total

1.  Identifying Outcomes that Are Important to Living Kidney Donors: A Nominal Group Technique Study.

Authors:  Camilla S Hanson; Jeremy R Chapman; John S Gill; John Kanellis; Germaine Wong; Jonathan C Craig; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Steve J Chadban; Amit X Garg; Angelique F Ralph; Jule Pinter; Joshua R Lewis; Allison Tong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Psychosocial and socioeconomic issues facing the living kidney donor.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Cheryl L Jacobs
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  Kidney exchange match rates in a large multicenter clearinghouse.

Authors:  Courtenay M Holscher; Kyle Jackson; Eric K H Chow; Alvin G Thomas; Christine E Haugen; Sandra R DiBrito; Carlin Purcell; Matthew Ronin; Amy D Waterman; Jacqueline Garonzik Wang; Allan B Massie; Sommer E Gentry; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  Long-term medical risks to the living kidney donor.

Authors:  Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Andrew S Levey; Bertram L Kasiske; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Emotional well-being of living kidney donors: findings from the RELIVE Study.

Authors:  S G Jowsey; C Jacobs; C R Gross; B A Hong; E E Messersmith; B W Gillespie; T J Beebe; C Kew; A Matas; R D Yusen; M Hill-Callahan; J Odim; S J Taler
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Dew; A F DiMartini; A J DeVito Dabbs; A Zuckoff; H P Tan; M L McNulty; G E Switzer; K R Fox; J B Greenhouse; A Humar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Allan Zuckoff; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Mary L McNulty; Kristen R Fox; Galen E Switzer; Abhinav Humar; Henkie P Tan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.187

8.  Live related donors in India: Their quality of life using world health organization quality of life brief questionnaire.

Authors:  Sunil K Vemuru Reddy; Sandeep Guleria; Okidi Okechukwu; Rajesh Sagar; Dipankar Bhowmik; Sandeep Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

9.  Quality of life following laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Clinton D Bahler; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Investigation of the physical and psychosocial outcomes after living kidney donation - a multicenter cohort study (SoLKiD - Safety of Living Kidney Donors).

Authors:  Barbara Suwelack; Viktoriya Wörmann; Klaus Berger; Joachim Gerß; Heiner Wolters; Frank Vitinius; Markus Burgmer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.