Literature DB >> 15547824

Surfactant replacement therapy on ECMO does not improve outcome in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Christopher E Colby1, Kevin P Lally, Susan R Hintz, Pamela A Lally, Dick Tibboel, Fernando R Moya, Krisa P VanMeurs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND
PURPOSE: Respiratory failure in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) may in part be caused by a primary or secondary surfactant deficiency. Knowledge of the optimal approach to surfactant replacement in neonates with CDH and respiratory failure is limited. The aim of this study was to determine if surfactant replacement on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) results in improved outcomes in neonates > or =35 weeks' gestation with unrepaired CDH.
METHODS: Using the CDH Study Group Registry, the authors identified 448 neonates with CDH who were > or =35 weeks' gestation, had no major anomalies, were treated with ECMO within the first 7 days of life, and underwent repair on or after ECMO therapy. Patients in 2 groups were compared: group 1 (- Surf, n = 334) consisted of patients who received no surfactant and group 2 (+ Surf, n = 114) consisted of patients who received at least 1 dose of surfactant while on ECMO. An analysis of all patients in both groups was performed. Additionally, subgroup analyses stratified by gestational age were performed for patients 351/7 to 366/7 weeks' gestation and for patients > or =37 weeks' gestation. Primary end-points for the study were survival and length of ECMO run. Secondary end-points were length of intubation, need for supplemental oxygen at 30 days of life, and at discharge to home. Demographic, clinical, and outcome variables were examined using Fisher's Exact tests for categorical variables and using unpaired t tests for continuous variables. Odds ratios were calculated for categorical end-point variables.
RESULTS: Demographic and clinical variables were similar between groups. Analyses of aggregate data showed no significant differences between groups in length of ECMO run, survival, number of days intubated, and percent of patients requiring supplemental oxygen at 30 days or discharge. Subgroup stratification by gestational age did not show significant differences between groups in any of the outcome variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study suggest that surfactant replacement on ECMO for neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia does not provide significant benefit in the infant's clinical course with respect to survival, length of ECMO course, length of intubation, or subsequent need for supplemental oxygen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15547824     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  6 in total

1.  Impact of our new protocol on the outcome of the neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Osamu Kimura; Taizo Furukawa; Koji Higuchi; Yuuki Takeuchi; Shigehisa Fumino; Shigeyoshi Aoi; Tatsuro Tajiri
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Decreased surfactant phosphatidylcholine synthesis in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Daphne J Janssen; Luc J Zimmermann; Paola Cogo; Aaron Hamvas; Kajsa Bohlin; Ingrid H Luijendijk; Darcos Wattimena; Virgilio P Carnielli; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Juan A Tovar
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Sphingolipids in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia; Results from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kitty G Snoek; Irwin K M Reiss; Jeroen Tibboel; Joost van Rosmalen; Irma Capolupo; Arno van Heijst; Thomas Schaible; Martin Post; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Respiratory Support of Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

Authors:  Emma Williams; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 6.  What's new in surfactant? A clinical view on recent developments in neonatology and paediatrics.

Authors:  Jasper V Been; Luc J I Zimmermann
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.