Philip E Castle1, Mark Schiffman, Cosette M Wheeler. 1. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA. castlep@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical value of a semiquantitative measure of human papillomavirus viral load by the hybrid capture 2 assay for stratification of the risk of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: The Atypical Cells of Unknown Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study was a randomized clinical trial of 5060 women with 2 years of follow-up to evaluate treatment strategies for women with equivocal or mildly abnormal cervical cytologic condition. The usefulness of the continuous hybrid capture 2 output relative light units/positive controls that were above the positive threshold (1.0 relative light units/positive controls), which was a surrogate for human papillomavirus viral load, for distinguishing between hybrid capture 2 positive women who were diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma during the study from those who were not diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma was examined with the use of receiver-operator characteristic analyses. RESULTS: Relative light units/positive controls values did not further discriminate between hybrid capture 2 positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma from those with less than cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma. The use of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe or carcinoma case definition did not alter our findings. CONCLUSION: Among women with atypical cells of unknown significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cervical cytologic findings, the hybrid capture 2 viral load measurement did not improve the detection of 2-year cumulative cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma significantly.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical value of a semiquantitative measure of human papillomavirus viral load by the hybrid capture 2 assay for stratification of the risk of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: The Atypical Cells of Unknown Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study was a randomized clinical trial of 5060 women with 2 years of follow-up to evaluate treatment strategies for women with equivocal or mildly abnormal cervical cytologic condition. The usefulness of the continuous hybrid capture 2 output relative light units/positive controls that were above the positive threshold (1.0 relative light units/positive controls), which was a surrogate for human papillomavirus viral load, for distinguishing between hybrid capture 2 positive women who were diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma during the study from those who were not diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma was examined with the use of receiver-operator characteristic analyses. RESULTS: Relative light units/positive controls values did not further discriminate between hybrid capture 2 positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma from those with less than cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma. The use of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe or carcinoma case definition did not alter our findings. CONCLUSION: Among women with atypical cells of unknown significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cervical cytologic findings, the hybrid capture 2 viral load measurement did not improve the detection of 2-year cumulative cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or carcinoma significantly.
Authors: A T Hesselink; N W J Bulkmans; J Berkhof; A T Lorincz; C J L M Meijer; P J F Snijders Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Long Fu Xi; Nancy B Kiviat; Denise A Galloway; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Jesse Ho; Laura A Koutsky Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Patti E Gravitt; Melinda Butsch Kovacic; Rolando Herrero; Mark Schiffman; Concepcion Bratti; Allan Hildesheim; Jorge Morales; Mario Alfaro; Mark E Sherman; Sholom Wacholder; Ana-Cecilia Rodriguez; Robert D Burk Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: N Muñoz; G Hernandez-Suarez; F Méndez; M Molano; H Posso; V Moreno; R Murillo; M Ronderos; C Meijer; A Muñoz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 7.640