Literature DB >> 15547412

A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in tympanoplasty after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children.

Joanne Anderson1, Per Cayé-Thomasen, Mirko Tos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare cartilage palisades with fascia grafting in reconstruction of the eardrum after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children, with respect to postoperative drum retraction and perforation, cholesteatoma recurrence, and hearing. MATERIAL: From March 1995 to October 2000, a total of 64 children, aged 5 to 15 years, underwent surgery for either sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma. The eardrum was reconstructed using cartilage palisades in 32 children and fascia or perichondrium in 32 children. Postoperatively, the patients were seen as out-patients and were recently reevaluated by otomicroscopy and audiometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative drum retraction and perforation, cholesteatoma recurrence, and hearing (pure tone average, speech reception threshold, and air-bone gap).
RESULTS: All patients in the palisade group and all but one patient in the fascia group attended the follow-up examination. In the palisade group, the mean follow-up period was 37 months (range, 3-65 mo) and in the fascia group 52 months (range, 17-75 mo). Two (6%) retractions and no perforations were found in the palisade group, versus 12 (36%) retractions and 4 perforations (12%) in the fascia group at follow-up (both significant differences). No cholesteatoma recurrence occurred. Late hearing results in sinus cholesteatomas were significantly better in the palisade group.
CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of fascia and cartilage palisade grafting for drum reconstruction after tensa cholesteatoma surgery in children indicates that the palisade technique may be superior in respect to prevention of drum retraction and perforation. Further, in sinus cholesteatoma surgery, the long-term hearing results are better when grafting cartilage palisades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15547412     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  7 in total

1.  Cartilage palisades in type 3 tympanoplasty: functional and hearing results.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Neeraj Narayan Mathur; Deepak Verma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-03-29

2.  Long-term anatomic and functional results of cartilage tympanoplasty in atelectatic ears.

Authors:  Cem Ozbek; Onur Ciftçi; Cafer Ozdem
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Tri-layer Tympanoplasty as a New Technique in High-risk Tympanic Membrane Perforations.

Authors:  Fevzi Solmaz; Davut Akduman; Mehmet Haksever
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09

4.  Palisade Cartilage Tympanoplasty, an Alternative Surgical Approach for CSOM.

Authors:  Shahid Rasool; Shifa Qureshi; Ashima Varshney; Simmi Hassan; Faiza Kokab; Khaja Naseeruddin
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07

5.  Tragal Perichondrium and Composite Cartilage Graft Complimenting Endoscopic Tympanoplasty in True Sense: A Comparison.

Authors:  Arvind Varma; Chetan Bansal; Virendra-Pratap Singh
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05

6.  A Short-term Comparison Between Result of Palisade Cartilage Tympanoplasty and Temporalis Fascia Technique.

Authors:  Mahmood Shishegar; Abolhasan Faramarzi; Ayeh Taraghi
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012

7.  Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Veysel Yurttas; Fatih Yakut; Ahmet Kutluhan; Kazım Bozdemir
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.